Just as last year I want to take the opportunity to have a look back and another one forward.
In 2018 my focus was on my new job, so I am grateful that I could rely on my team to keep the blog running.
Bastian was by far the most active one of us in 2018. Some of his reviews which stood out to me were the Sony GM 1.4/85 (first Sony lens he liked), the Carl Zeiss Jena 1.9/183 (very affordable cinema lens with interesting characteristics), Pocketpano Vario XL Panorama, because this is a product which is obviously designed by a person passionate about solving photographer’s issues, just like the handy Loxia lens-grips. He also wrote several guides of which I would like to mention How to Create environmental portraits and Best Astro lenses for the Sony a7 series.
David and I collaborated on the comprehensive E-mount macro guide and he reviewed interesting niche lenses like the Zeiss ZM 1.5/50 and Pentax 2.8/35 Macro. He also reviewed the excellent Zeiss ZM 4/85 and Canon EF 2.8/200 L.
Jannik started his year with the quest for a replacement for his Sony a7II which couldn’t keep up with his son anymore. After trying the Fuji X-T2 and Nikon D750 he ended up with the Sony a7III and sold most of his manual lenses to replace them with AF lenses like the GM 1.4/24, ZA 1.4/50 and Tamron 2.8/28-75 which was our most popular review in 2018.
Tamron 2.8/28-75 | Sony A7iii | 28mm | f/2.8
Also mentioned should be the guest reviews from Nehemiah, who reviewed the Pentax limited 1.8/31, from Stephen who reviewed the Sony STF 2.8/100 and Leica APO Elmarit 2.8/180. And Sebboh who reviewed the Contax G 2.8/28.
A big thank you to all of you! I am a little proud that this blog remains a passion driven resource in a very profit driven environment and this wouldn’t be possible without you contributing your own experience and time.
At the beginning of 2018 Sony was the only bigger company in the FF mirrorless market. At the end of 2018 that has changed.
Canon released the EOS-R and some very serious lenses like the 1.2/50 alongside it. I haven‘t handled it but by the accounts I read about it it didn‘t close the IQ gap nor did it play on Canon‘s strength in intuitive user design. So I see it as a herald of a platform which will undoubtedly bring us some excellent lenses though it seems that Canon puts performance ahead of a smaller size. I really wonder though if there will ever come a point where the technology in their cameras isn’t behind the competition.
Nikon‘s Z6 and Z7 received more positive reviews and thanks to a very good EVF and thinner sensor stack they might become the new favorite platform to adapt lenses to. Nikon has the biggest mount diameter and advertised that quite a lot but the lenses released so far remained behind my expectations.
Sony released only one camera in 2018 and that was the Sony a7III. It ended Jannik’s quest for a camera capable of keeping up with his son. Like the a7rIII it is a very well rounded camera which doesn‘t have any serious weak points. Personally I only wished that the EVF would be a bit higher resolution since I still use manual focus lenses most of the time.
CaNikon‘s releases didn’t quite meet my expectations. I would have expected that they would try to overtake Sony with their first generation cameras and instead they failed to catch up in some important areas. Especially Nikon’s cameras are certainly good enough to curtail the loss of users to Sony but personally I don’t feel the least bit tempted to switch. Neither does Bastian. But I hope that the new competition will drive Sony to improve aspects like quality control. I also hope to see even better EVFs in 2019 since that is one of few areas where I see some real potential to significantly improve the user experience.
As a team we were most impressed by the Sony GM 1.4/24. I think it demonstrates how Sony has matured as a lens manufacturer and now exploits the full potential of the E-mount. What makes the GM 1.4/24 special is not the excellent performance in about any aspect, we have come to expect that in recent years. What makes the Sony 1.4/24 special is that it does not come with the tradeoffs you usually pay for such high performance. The GM 24 has high SA outside the sharpness plane which keeps bokeh contrast very low and adds to a very smooth bokeh which often suffers to a degree with highly corrected lenses. It also keeps mechanical vignetting to a minimum and that way avoids the cat-eyes which are a trade off with all compact M-mount lenses. It eliminates onion rings and focuses fast despite having big elements which need to be moved. And it does all that while weighting just 450 g. That way it managed to exceed our expectations by quite some margin and make us curious about what is yet to come.
Another lens which managed to exceed our expectations with a very good balance of performance, size and price is the Tamron 2.8/28-75. It is not a lens for geeks who fancy manual lenses but a very versatile tool and we really look forward to the next E-mount lenses from Tamron.
When Cosina announced the Voigtlander 2.5/110 APO-Macro my expectations were really high because of the outstanding performance of the 2/65 and the legendary reputation of the 2.5/125. I haven’t used my copy a lot but so far I think they managed to match expectations and basically created the highest performing E-mount lens yet. The only trade-off I can report is higher mechanical vignetting. The new Voigtlander 3.5/21 trades a little performance for the really small size which is a trade-off we appreciate. Cosina’s 1.2/50 which is yet to be released in E-mount also trades some optical perfection for speed and size. Obviously Cosina meets my personal demands very well, I bought and kept three lenses in 2018, all of them Voigtlanders and I hope to see the APO-line extended by a modern 4/180 in 2019 and see a very compact 35mm high performance lens.
Sigma has released a series of rather successful native APS-C lenses in E-mount but only remounted SLR-designs for FF cameras many of which are sharpest in class but absurdly large. So we are still waiting for native mirrorless lenses and we are still curious if those will be balanced more towards a reasonable size than their SLR-lenses.
Zeiss was not very active in 2018. They released the Loxia 2.4/25 which I found to be an excellent landscape lens . They also released the Batis 2/40 which was a bit of an embarrassment to them since it has issues with AF and forces users to stop down at closer distances. They were also absent from Photokina.
Last year the Laowa 2/15 managed to balance size and performance really well. This year they released the 4.5-5.6/10-18 – which was a very ambitious design given the small size they went for – but it comes with quite a few serious compromises. I enjoyed talking to MR. Li at PK who is obviously really passionate about his lenses and thankfully more focused on usability than the very last bit of performance but I think Laowa really needs to realize electronic communication for their lenses to be successful in 2019 and beyond given their more ambitious pricing.
Samyang released the tiny 2.8/24 and I reviewed it but I didn’t really warm to it. Samyang is very competitive on price and to me it seems like they compromise on quality control and coatings to remain affordable. In some cases this will be a reasonable trade-off in some cases but over the long term their lenses seem not as affordable to me as the first look would suggest.
For the E-mount system 2018 was not a exciting year since new lenses added a options for users but it is not as if they redefined the system which was already quite well rounded at the start of the year. It will be interesting to see how competition will drive development forward. I am also curious about CaNikon’s approach to lens design in their next releases.
I will try to maintain the blog as an independent resource on mostly manual lenses in the future. One aspect which has suffered a little in recent time are more affordable lenses simply because the more expensive options have become more and better. If you have some experience with manual lenses and are interested in reviewing more affordable lenses for the E-mount please get in contact.
I think the blog did well in 2018 despite my much reduced activity for which Bastian shares most responsibility but I also have to thank David, Jannik, Stephen, Sebboh and Nehemiah for their contribution. And of course you the readers and commentators who keep coming back and sharing the blog with others!
Latest posts by Phillip Reeve (see all)
- Review: Samyang AF 75/1.8 FE - April 12, 2021
- The FE-List now has 113 lenses on it - March 25, 2021
- Announced: Voigtlander 35mm F2 Apo-Lanthar - February 15, 2021
39 thoughts on “2018 – The Year in Review”
Hello, thank you very much for all this contribution and tests. I would like to talk about un excellent lens witch i used et be very happy with it, its the Pentax a 50mm f2.8 macro 1:2, used with alpha series et Fuji it give an excellent results. So i hope you will do a test for this lens and gives us your opinion ☺
Thank you! You’re running a great website, it’s a real pleasure to read the reviews here!
Happy to read that 🙂
Cheers to the best blog in the Sony world. I have to think that any serious Sony shooter comes here first for knowledgeable real-world reviews and thoughts – and waits impatiently while you all are reviewing lenses 😉 You manage to walk the line between artistic examples and pixel-peeping samples to satisfy exactly what we all need!
Seriously, you have created an authoritative resource for all of us, and we owe you much. Have great holidays and a successful new year!
Thanks Jordan and a good 2019 to you.
Congrats Philip and the gang on a great 2018 year. You guys haven’t lost it: still independent, honest and passionate!
I Have a question I would love to be answered in 2019: do highly corrected lenses
(High number of elements …) have to be more liveless? In your reviews what I really like is that you don t limit your tests to sharpness but also give an evaluation on contrast, micro contrast (3D pop), color tone…I find the latter to be very important. Minolta colors. Zeiss pop is that all marketing? It s one I m talking about this: https://yannickkhong.com/blog/2016/2/23/the-problem-with-modern-optics.
What is your take on this?
I think what that site says is utter BS. Yes, there are subtle differences between brands but they have a very minor effect on the image once post processing is applied.
Thanks I agree with that, especially after post processing, which will all do anyway. Now what about loss of contrast and micro contrast with high number of elements?
Also complete BS. Most people will agree that the Loxia 21mm 2.8 has very high micro contrast, yet it features 11 elements in 9 groups, which is a rather high count of elements.
I also failed to see a difference between Loxia 85mm 2.4 (7 elements) and GM 85mm 1.4 (11 elements) in that regard.
Ok thanks Bastiank for making that clear! An article on all this would make a great addition there is a lot of talks on forums about it!
Nah, we are not getting into that.
Such an article will mostly attract fanboy trolls, we are not interested in that.
Hi, thanks for the wonderfull reviews in 2018, but I am wondering why you have never reviewed the Sony Full Frame Standart Zoom 28-70 FE. I think it is the only lens from Sony you forgot! Its reputation is near the Zeiss 24-70 F4.I use this lens on older Sony aps-c cameras with good bokeh and nice performance and it is stabilized.
Sorry, I have to correct, bokeh is not so good on this lens!
there are short abstracs here and there, e.g. in this guide:
“Recommendation: It is a is a good enough lens with a handy zoom range well worth the $200 you pay for it in a kit.”
Personally, i once got a very bad copy on ebay when i first started with my A7 and never really got over this shock (even throwing away 60EUR for usless servicing/centering at geissler — dont work with them! — that i better had spent on old manual glass).
Even my RX100 is alot better in terms of sharpness than my copy of this lens. I would be interesting what a good copy of the FE2870 can do compared to the tamron 28-75/2.8 (i.e. why this blog “wouldn’t recommend it for serious photography.”… )
Well a bad copy is never worth it. Here is a test I did when I was less experienced but it still shows good enough performance: https://www.systemkamera-forum.de/topic/100687-sony-fe-35-5628-70-oss-sony-a7-beispielbilder-und-kurztest/
The voigtlander 110 – having used it !!! Do you think it is a useful landscape lens or a close focus lens with a passable option in landscape !!!! ???
There are extremely good offers on for zeiss loxia lenses at present & I am trying to make a final decision !!!
Loxia 85mm or the Voigtlander 110 – the latter being for occasional close up use if I bought it !!!!
Which would the team / you recommend for a landscape priority use between these two
I want a prime lens in this area of focal length !!!! A longer loxia would have been perfect – I found the added macro option of the V’lander an interesting area to explore but it’s not my deciding factor
Many thanks & all the best
The Voigtlander is pretty awesome an technically even better than the Loxia but that by itself is one of the very best landscape lenses available and with a landscape focus I would probably prefer it.
There are only a couple of sites where I know every feedback I’m getting is 100% accurate and honest, specially if you like not only the best but also the more affordable (MF) options for the system.
Keep on doing your best and congratulations, my friends.
by far my favourite blog of the year!
keep on the good work.
Visiting the blog to see if it’s updated has definitely become one of my daily routines. lol Best wishes to you and Happy new year!!!
Thank you team for all the reviews and guides. It must be a great effort to keep this going. I´m also a manual lense lover
Thank you guys for the detailed reviews! Your blog is my favorite resource for lenses and other gear.
Thanks a lot and I’m looking forward for the reviews of 2019 🙂
Thank you for all that you do!
I bought an A7ii and your site has proven to be a goldmine!
Best regards from a fellow German
Thanks Patrick 🙂
Appreciate your blog guys! I visit it almost every day. You opened for me the door to manual and retrofitted lenses and reviewed the joy in photography for me.
Keep up the good work.
Looking forward to next year!
Happy to read that Werner 🙂
A big thank you to all the contributors for their work – this is a very solid and useful corpus of work, both with your lens reviews and your general purpose guides. You have informed several of my lens choices through the years, and sometimes spark a reshuffle to my lens selection for the elusive goldilock backpacking lens set.
Good luck on the hunt for goldilock in 2019 then 🙂
Guys, what I like here is that you made a method for lens testing which you apply consistently, and a style of presenting your opinion which is so balanced that it looks very scientific/objective.
Happy New Year to all of you.
You described our intentions pretty well, glad to see that it comes across.
All the best in 2019 guys, keep up the good work I appreciate it very much (my wallet less so ?) , hope to see many new reviews and especially guides as the brenizer pano and uww portraiture…
maybe i can see viltrox FE lens reviews in 2019
I have enjoyed your blog tremendously.
HAPPY NEW YEAR !!
and many many more to come.
Thank you for making this blog so enjoyable.
Happy new year to you as well Bernard 🙂
Thank you and your team for the great work done in 2018 and looking forward to 2019.
P.S.: Your blog is on my blogroll, because it is one of the best blogs about Sony Cams and old lenses.
Thanks Bernhard and good light in 2019!
Still the best blog for Sony by some distance.
Some of the most intelligent writing on any photography blog anywhere, and of course, by far the best photographic examples. Probably the main reason I come here is just to look at your photos. Inspirational.
Of course one issue with this is no matter how bad the lens you review, the examples always look awesome :).
This blog is a huge pleasure. If you can review some more affordable lenses that would be lovely too.
Thanks a lot Paul 🙂