{"id":10458,"date":"2017-11-01T07:58:13","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T06:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/?p=10458"},"modified":"2026-03-24T13:32:52","modified_gmt":"2026-03-24T12:32:52","slug":"review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Introduction<\/h1>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-10481 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title-768x432.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is another copy of a Zeiss lens, this time the Zeiss Sonnar 135mm 4.0. This one is really cheap, but is it also as good as the <a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-9-85mm-2-0\/\">Jupiter-9 85mm 2.0<\/a>? Let us find out!<\/p>\n<h1>Sample Images<\/h1>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10466\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10466\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10466 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_3.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_3.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_3-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_3-768x432.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10466\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/8.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10465\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10465\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10465 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_2.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_2.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_2-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_2-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10465\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/5.6<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10464\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10464\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10464 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_1.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_1.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sample_1-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10464\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/4.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<h1>Specifications \/ Version History<\/h1>\n<p>The outer apperance of the lens has changed over time and regarding the optics early versions may actually use Zeiss glass produced in Germany and some later ones may have different coatings as well. So in case you are curious, take a look at the page <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sovietcams.com\/index.php?2125494681\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sovietcams.com<\/a>, for additional coverage.<\/p>\n<p>I am reviewing a rather late lens from 1991 here (the first two digits of the serial number are the production year, 91 in this case) which has the following specifications:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Diameter: 49.0 mm<\/li>\n<li>Field of view: 18\u00b0 (diagonally)<\/li>\n<li>Length:&nbsp; 96.0 mm + adapter<\/li>\n<li>Weight: 260 g<\/li>\n<li>Filter Diameter: 40.5&nbsp; mm<\/li>\n<li>Number of Aperture Blades: 15 (rounded)<\/li>\n<li>Elements\/Groups: 4\/3<\/li>\n<li>Close Focusing Distance: <strong>2.5 m!<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Maximum Magnification: 1:X<\/li>\n<li>Mount: M39 (aka LTM or Zorki)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>A Jupiter-11 in good condition usually starts selling for <strong>$45<\/strong> at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebay.de\/sch\/i.html?_ex_kw=&amp;_mPrRngCbx=1&amp;_nkw=jupiter+11+135+m39&amp;_sacat=625&amp;_sop=12&amp;_udhi=&amp;_udlo=&amp;_fosrp=1&amp;mkrid=707-53477-19255-0&amp;siteid=77&amp;mkcid=1&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;toolid=10001&amp;customid=&amp;mkevt=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ebay.com<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/roverimp\/1\/711-53200-19255-0\/1?ff3=9&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;uq=jupiter+9+85+m39&amp;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]\"> (advertisement\/affiliate link). In Germany buying one in A-condition will set you back at least <strong>60\u20ac.<\/strong> I got mine at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebay.de\/sch\/i.html?_ex_kw=&amp;_mPrRngCbx=1&amp;_nkw=jupiter+11+135+m39&amp;_sacat=625&amp;_sop=12&amp;_udhi=&amp;_udlo=&amp;_fosrp=1&amp;mkrid=707-53477-19255-0&amp;siteid=77&amp;mkcid=1&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;toolid=10001&amp;customid=&amp;mkevt=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ebay.de<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/roverimp\/1\/707-53477-19255-0\/1?ff3=9&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;uq=jupiter+9+85+m39&amp;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]\"> (advertisement\/affiliate link).<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<h1>Handling \/ Build Quality<\/h1>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10479\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10479\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10479\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_handling.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_handling.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_handling-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_handling-768x432.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10479\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>There is quite some sample variation with these lenses. This one has an easy to operate aperture ring but a focusing ring with uneven resistance.&nbsp; You can either<strong> try fixing this yourself<\/strong> with the help of some tutorials or videos on the internet <strong>or bring it to a repair shop<\/strong> instead.&nbsp; The best idea is of course to <strong>buy your lens from a trusted seller<\/strong>. I can recommened this <a href=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/rover\/1\/711-53200-19255-0\/1?icep_ff3=11&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;icep_store=vintagephotoequipmentandother&amp;ipn=psmain&amp;icep_vectorid=229466&amp;kwid=902099&amp;mtid=824&amp;kw=lg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ebay shop<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/roverimp\/1\/711-53200-19255-0\/1?ff3=11&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;store=vintagephotoequipmentandother&amp;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]\" alt=\"\"> (affiliate link) as I have bought lenses there myself.<br \/>\nTurning the <strong>focusing ring<\/strong> from infinity to 2.5 m takes about <strong>170\u00b0<\/strong>, turning the <strong>aperture ring<\/strong> from f\/4.0 to f\/22 takes about <strong>80\u00b0<\/strong>. The aperture ring has <strong>no click stops<\/strong>. I prefer click stops but in case you consider filming with this lens you may prefer it the way it is. There is no official hood I know of. Using filters is not a problem as the filter ring doesn&#8217;t rotate.<br \/>\nThis lens is <strong>made from aluminium<\/strong> which contributes to the low weight but is also <strong>very good at attracting scratches<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10480\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10480\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10480\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_hood.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_hood.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_hood-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_hood-768x432.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10480\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 with generic 40.5 mm hood<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The previous owner bought a generic 40.5mm thread hood for this lens, as we will see later you really need one of these&#8230;<\/p>\n<h1>Vignetting and colorcast<\/h1>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-10502 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/vignetting_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"750\" height=\"610\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/vignetting_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0.jpg 750w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/vignetting_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0-300x244.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>At f\/4.0 and f\/5.6 the extreme corners are significantly darker than the rest of the image which can be quite distracting.<\/p>\n<h1>Sharpness<\/h1>\n<p><em>infinity<\/em><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-10460 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Sharpness_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"1708\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Sharpness_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Sharpness_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0-141x300.jpg 141w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Sharpness_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0-768x1640.jpg 768w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/Sharpness_jupiter-11_135mm_4.0-600x1280.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><br \/>\nAcross frame sharpness is actually pretty good already wide open. Stopping down to f\/5.6 boosts contrast a bit, but this lens never reaches the resolution figures of modern lenses or even the <a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-leica-135mm-4-0-tele-elmar\/\">Leica 135mm 4.0 Tele Elmar<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h1>Flare resistance<\/h1>\n<p>One of the worst performances I have seen so far. Even on an overcast day you will encounter severe issues with veiling flare. In this example the upper half looks quite okay while the lower half is overshadowed by veiling flare:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10462\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10462\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10462\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare2.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare2.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare2-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare2-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10462\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/5.6<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>These shots look like there is no contrast whatsoever, also because of veiling flare:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10467\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10467\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10467\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_veiling_flare.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_veiling_flare.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_veiling_flare-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_veiling_flare-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10467\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/4.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10463\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10463\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10463\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare3.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare3.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare3-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare3-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10463\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/4.0<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>With a lens hood the performance improves quite a bit, but it doesn&#8217;t always help and in the end I can only rate this performance as being very bad.<\/p>\n<h1>Distortion<\/h1>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-10461 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_distortion.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_distortion.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_distortion-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_distortion-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>There is<strong> some minor pincushion Distortion <\/strong>which I don&#8217;t consider an issue for most applications.<\/p>\n<h1>Bokeh<\/h1>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10489\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10489\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10489\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_bokeh.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_bokeh.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_bokeh-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_bokeh-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10489\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/4.0 | set to minimum focus distance<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A maximum aperture of f\/4.0 at 135mm isn\u2019t exactly breathtaking when talking about the ability to separate subjects from the background. But the minimum focus distance of 2.5 m makes things really difficult. To give you an impression how bad this is: you can&#8217;t even get close enough for a full head shot with this lens&#8230;. <em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, because of 15 rounded aperture blades highlights in the background stay round even on stopping down.<\/p>\n<h1>Sunstars<\/h1>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10490\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10490\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10490\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sunstars.jpg\" alt=\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sunstars.jpg 800w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sunstars-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_sunstars-768x513.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10490\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/11<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>With those 15 rounded aperture blades you will barely see sunstars at all. See our <a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/best-lenses-for-sunstars\/\">&#8220;Best lenses for Sunstars&#8221; article<\/a> for further reference.<\/p>\n<h1>Chromatic aberrations<\/h1>\n<p><em>longitudinal<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This lens is not very fast and the often somewhat lowish contrast masks this issue. Still the loCA correction seems to be quite okay, probably better than the<a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-leica-135mm-4-0-tele-elmar\/\"> Leica 135mm 4.0 Tele Elmar<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><em>lateral<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In the corners you can spot <strong>some<\/strong> <strong>lateral&nbsp;CAs <\/strong>which can be easily corrected in post, as can be seen in the example below (100% crop).<br \/>\n<div class=\"twentytwenty\" class=\"twentytwenty-container\" style=\"display: none; max-width: 100%; width: 800px; height: 534px\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_flare2ca.jpg\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_ca.jpg\"\/><\/div><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #808080;\"><em>Sony A7rII | Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 | f\/11 | CA 100% crop before\/after extreme corner<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<h1>Alternatives<\/h1>\n<p><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-leica-135mm-4-0-tele-elmar\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Leica 135mm 4.0 Tele Elmar:<\/a><\/strong><\/em><br \/>\nExcept for price and weight better in every regard. In case you have use for a 135mm 4.0 better consider this still very affordable Leica lens.<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-canon-ef-135mm-2-0l\/\"><strong><em>Canon EF 135mm 2.0L USM:<\/em><\/strong><\/a><br \/>\nThis is still one of my most favorite portrait lenses on the A7 cameras. This is also a much better lens in almost every regard, but it is also considerably bigger, a little heavier and of course way more expensive.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-samyang\/\"><em><strong>Samyang 135mm 2.0 ED UMC:<\/strong><\/em><\/a><br \/>\nThis is even be a bit better optically than the aforementioned Canon lens, but it is even bigger and heavier.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-canon-nfd-2-8135\/\"><em><strong>Canon FD 135mm 2.8:<\/strong><\/em><\/a><br \/>\nShows a bit more CA and optically inferior to the aforementioned lenses, but still a better choice and at a similar price.<\/p>\n<h1>Conclusion<\/h1>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>good<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #339966;\">across frame sharpness (except for extreme corners) already at f\/4.0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #339966;\">correction of longitudinal CA<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #339966;\">size<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #339966;\">price<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<td><strong>average<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>bokeh<\/li>\n<li>correction of lateral CA<\/li>\n<li>distortion<\/li>\n<li>vignetting<\/li>\n<li>build quality<\/li>\n<li>weight<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<td><strong>not good<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">minimum focus distance of 2.5m!<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">flare resistance!<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">maximum magnification<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">sunstars<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>As some of you may remember I wasn&#8217;t overly impressed by the <a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-leica-135mm-4-0-tele-elmar\/\">Leica 135mm 4.0 Tele Elmar<\/a>. A slow 135mm lens with bad minimum focus distance which does not excel in any category does not serve me a purpose. Thing is, this Jupiter-11 is much worse compared to that Leica lens. And while Leica lenses are usually very expensive this is not the case here, you can easily find one for less than 200$.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the unusual vignetting pattern, the disastrous flare resistance and the ridiculously bad minimum focus distance I can&#8217;t really recommend this lens to anyone.<\/p>\n<p>Rather have a look at the <a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-leica-135mm-4-0-tele-elmar\/\">Leica 135mm 4.0 Tele Elmar<\/a> if you want something small with great build quality or at the<a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-canon-nfd-2-8135\/\"> Canon FD 135mm 2.8<\/a> if you want something better suited for taking portraits.<\/p>\n<p><em>A Jupiter-11 in good condition usually starts selling for <strong>$45<\/strong> at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebay.de\/sch\/i.html?_ex_kw=&amp;_mPrRngCbx=1&amp;_nkw=jupiter+11+135+m39&amp;_sacat=625&amp;_sop=12&amp;_udhi=&amp;_udlo=&amp;_fosrp=1&amp;mkrid=707-53477-19255-0&amp;siteid=77&amp;mkcid=1&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;toolid=10001&amp;customid=&amp;mkevt=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ebay.com<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/roverimp\/1\/711-53200-19255-0\/1?ff3=9&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;uq=jupiter+9+85+m39&amp;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]\"> (advertisement\/affiliate link). In Germany buying one in A-condition will set you back at least <strong>60\u20ac.<\/strong> I got mine at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebay.de\/sch\/i.html?_ex_kw=&amp;_mPrRngCbx=1&amp;_nkw=jupiter+11+135+m39&amp;_sacat=625&amp;_sop=12&amp;_udhi=&amp;_udlo=&amp;_fosrp=1&amp;mkrid=707-53477-19255-0&amp;siteid=77&amp;mkcid=1&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;toolid=10001&amp;customid=&amp;mkevt=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ebay.de<\/a><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/rover.ebay.com\/roverimp\/1\/707-53477-19255-0\/1?ff3=9&amp;pub=5575156171&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337820268&amp;customid=&amp;uq=jupiter+9+85+m39&amp;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]\"> (advertisement\/affiliate link).<\/em><\/p>\n<h1>Further Reading<\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/lenses\/\">Our lens reviews<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/mini-tripods-for-mirrorless-cameras\/\">Mini tripods for mirrorless cameras<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-canon-ef-200mm-1-8-l\/\">Review: Canon 200mm 1.8 L on Sony A7rII<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1>Support Us<\/h1>\n<p>Did you find this article useful or just liked reading it? Treat us to a coffee!<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/donate\/?hosted_button_id=3K9EJRRQVXT4J\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-40345 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/donate2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"103\" height=\"29\"><\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/en_SE\/i\/scr\/pixel.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\"> <span style=\"color: #999999;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/en_SE\/i\/scr\/pixel.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" border=\"0\"><em>via Paypal<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This site contains advertisement\/affiliate links. If you make a purchase using any of the links marked as advertisement\/affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the creation of future content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is another copy of a Zeiss lens, this time the Zeiss Sonnar 135mm 4.0. This one is really cheap, but is it also as good as the Jupiter-9 85mm 2.0? Let us find out! Sample Images<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4708,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,7,18,419],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leica-m","category-lenses","category-review","category-vintage"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"phillipreeve.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bastian.kratzke\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-11-01T06:58:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-24T12:32:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title_fb.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"BastianK\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"BastianK\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/\",\"name\":\"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-11-01T06:58:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-24T12:32:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/9b7aa081afe07a6cae2e7d1ea1b476d7\"},\"description\":\"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg\",\"width\":800,\"height\":450,\"caption\":\"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"phillipreeve.net\",\"description\":\"Sony \u03b1 | Leica M | Nikon Z\/F New articles every week\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/9b7aa081afe07a6cae2e7d1ea1b476d7\",\"name\":\"BastianK\",\"description\":\"My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f\/0.95 to a 200mm f\/1.8) and I also have reviewed way too many 35mm lenses. Don't ask me anything about macro or wildlife shooting though.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/bastian_k\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bastian.kratzke\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/bastiankratzke\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/bastian-kratzke-450636164\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/author\/bastiank\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net","description":"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net","og_description":"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?","og_url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/","og_site_name":"phillipreeve.net","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bastian.kratzke","article_published_time":"2017-11-01T06:58:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-24T12:32:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title_fb.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"BastianK","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"BastianK","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/","url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/","name":"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 - phillipreeve.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg","datePublished":"2017-11-01T06:58:13+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-24T12:32:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/9b7aa081afe07a6cae2e7d1ea1b476d7"},"description":"The Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0 is a low cost lens and a Zeiss Sonnar copy. Is it any good on the modern Sony A7 series cameras?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/jupiter-11_135mm_4.0_title.jpg","width":800,"height":450,"caption":"jupiter 11 135mm 4.0 soviet bokeh portrait sony a7 review e-mount leica"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Quick Review: Jupiter-11 135mm 4.0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/","name":"phillipreeve.net","description":"Sony \u03b1 | Leica M | Nikon Z\/F New articles every week","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/9b7aa081afe07a6cae2e7d1ea1b476d7","name":"BastianK","description":"My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f\/0.95 to a 200mm f\/1.8) and I also have reviewed way too many 35mm lenses. Don't ask me anything about macro or wildlife shooting though.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/bastian_k","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bastian.kratzke","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/bastiankratzke","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/bastian-kratzke-450636164\/"],"url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/author\/bastiank\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4708"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10458"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10458\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85788,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10458\/revisions\/85788"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}