{"id":6,"date":"2013-11-15T23:20:41","date_gmt":"2013-11-15T21:20:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/wordpress\/?p=6"},"modified":"2024-04-21T15:08:23","modified_gmt":"2024-04-21T14:08:23","slug":"carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Carl Zeiss 16-70mm 1:4 made by Sony is an expensive standard lens for the Nex \/ APS-C E-mount line of cameras. It combines a very useful focal range with a decent moderate speed and size.<\/p>\n

All in all I think it is an interesting lens but it has some weaknesses which will be a deal breaker for some photographers.<\/p>\n

You can buy the Zeiss 4\/16-70 at Amazon.com<\/a>\u00a0for $998or for 799\u20ac at\u00a0Amazon.de<\/a>\u00a0(affiliate links)<\/p>\n

About this review<\/strong><\/p>\n

I am a landscape and nature photographer and focus more on aspects which are important to me.<\/p>\n

All images are taken with a Nex-6, processed with Adobe Lightroom 4 and can be found in full resolution at flickr by clicking on the image.<\/p>\n

Specifications<\/strong><\/p>\n

Size (diameter x length): 66mm x 75mm
\n<\/span>Filter Thread: 55mm
\nWeight: 308g
\nCose Focusing Distance \/ max. Reproduction Ration: 0.35 m \/ 1:4.35<\/p>\n

Visit Sony<\/a> to get the full specififcations.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"9922459396_c68bd897ce_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Size & Weight<\/strong><\/p>\n

You can see the images above, the lens it not much bigger than the average 18-55 Kit lens and therefore a perfect match for the Nex. It weights about 300g. Comparable DSLR lenses weight about 450gwhich is a very noticeable difference.<\/p>\n

Build quality<\/strong><\/p>\n

Is quite nice and the lens feels like a premium lens but it does not feel as robust as a professional lens to me (as for example the Sony 70-400G SSM does).<\/p>\n

The zoom-ring is made from metal and is perfectly damped and feels a little better than the SEL1855’s.<\/p>\n

It is the same for the focusing ring, manual focus works quite well with a nice transmission.<\/p>\n

The inner barrel and filter thread are made from plastic, play is minimal (which is less than with the SEL1855).<\/p>\n

AF<\/strong><\/p>\n

AF is pretty snappy and noiseless. I don’t own many E-Mount AF lenses but it is much quicker that the 50\/1.8, hunting is rarely seen.<\/p>\n

The precision was pretty high, I got 3 or 4 misses while taking 1200 pictures.<\/p>\n

Image stabilizer<\/strong><\/p>\n

It works well and is noiseless.<\/p>\n

As I did not perform a test series I can not tell you about how effective it really is.<\/span><\/p>\n

I got sharp images @70mm with a shutter speed of 1\/25 sec, see the image below.<\/p>\n

\"10056503256_1d65c8287a_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

70mm_f56_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

Optical performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

When I ran some initial tests I was quite disappointed by the lousy corner sharpness at 50mm and above.<\/p>\n

It turns out that Sony had sent me a severely decentered copy<\/span><\/span>. So while one corner turned in a lousy performance another one was \u00a0okay.<\/p>\n

For my testing I decided to use the best corner and assume that a correctly centered copy would perform as well or better in all 4 corners.<\/p>\n

\"10056892783_7367d0d7e3_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Flare resistance<\/strong><\/p>\n

If the full sun is in the frame the image won\u2019t be usable<\/p>\n

\"9965004754_8beaa335ee_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

SEL1670Z_FullResolution (5 von 12)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

But when it is partially shaded the lens performs quite nice<\/p>\n

\"9977892343_aef39cc033_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bokeh<\/strong><\/p>\n

The bokeh is really nice with pretty smooth transitions an not defined highlight disks. Exceptional for a zoom.<\/p>\n

Sometimes minor onion-rings can be seen.<\/p>\n

\"9965108693_3265e7277c_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

SEL1670Z_FullResolution (1 von 12)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9818753014_0235d2c16f_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

ZEISSHD<\/a> by Phillip Reeve<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9965006374_41fbc422c0_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

SEL1670Z_FullResolution (3 von 12)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"10056581903_7fcc15b210_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

31mm f5.6 SEL1670F4Z FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

Colors and Contrast<\/strong><\/p>\n

I was really happy with the colors and contrast, but that is a subjective impression and not based on any methodical testing. I think this can be attributed to the Zeiss T* coatings.<\/p>\n

Distortion<\/strong><\/p>\n

As I mostly do landscapes so I didn\u2019t check it,\u00a0unlike with the 18-105 or 16-50PZ distortions are not so severe that you have to correct them.<\/p>\n

If it helps I took some photographs of a A4 sized sheet of paper.<\/p>\n

16mm<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a035mm<\/a>\u00a0| 70mm<\/a><\/p>\n

Sharpness<\/strong><\/p>\n

Please remember that my lens was decentered, a perfectly centered lens might perform better!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Please click on the images to see them in full resolution.<\/p>\n

16mm<\/strong>
\n\"16mm\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Analysis
\n<\/span>The outer corners are never really good.<\/p>\n

The rest of the frame is sharp from f\/4 with a slight improvement when stopping down once.
\nDiffraction results in a small drop in sharpness at f\/8 and a bigger drop at f\/11.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"9964981505_415a4618bb_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

SEL1670Z_FullResolution (2 von 12)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"10056556563_83371aafdd_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

16mm_f8_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9852650836_3e3e3884fd_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

16mm_f11_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution (2 von 8)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9817810676_552d8f7448_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

16mm_f9_SEL1670F4Z<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

19mm<\/strong>
\n\"19mmCenter\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"19mmMidframe\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"19mmCornerR\"<\/a>
\nAnalysis
\n<\/span>The center of the image is great even at f\/4, diffraction sets in at f\/8 and becomes really obvious at f\/11.<\/p>\n

The midzone benefits from stopping down to f\/5.6 .
\nCorners are better than at 16mm but not perfect. They improve a little bit when one stops down 1 or 2 stops.<\/p>\n

\"10056575443_5d702828b1_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

mm_f_SEL1670F4Z__FullResolution (6 von 16)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"10056559893_ffb07c2acb_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

21mm_f8_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

28mm
\n<\/strong>
\n\"28mmCenter\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"28mmMidframe\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"28mmRightCorner\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Analysis
\n<\/span>Center: excellent from f\/4, small drop at f\/8. significant drop in sharpness at f\/11
\nMidframe: f\/5.6 is optimal here
\nCorner: stop down to f\/5.6 for best decent, f\/8 is about the same.<\/p>\n

35mm
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"10056511346_00a59bcb93_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

39mm_f_SEL1670F4Z__FullResolution (7 von 16)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"10056544283_9732e68c78_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

34mm_f8_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9817806976_30ebec5ae2_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

34mm_f9_SEL1670F4Z34mm_f9_SEL1670F4Z<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

50mm<\/strong>\"10056517176_0b58a9217f_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

53mm_f_SEL1670F4Z__FullResolution (5 von 16)<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/span>
\nCenter: \u00a0the image is somewhat soft at f\/4. This softness is gone at f\/5.6 which is the optimal aperture.
\nMidframe: f\/4 is significantly worse than f\/5.6 \u00a0which is the opimal value
\nCorner: the corners never become really shar, performance is best at f\/8 and f\/11<\/p>\n

70mm<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

please remember that the lens is decentered! It is most obvious at the long end.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/span>
\nCenter: \u00a0the image is somewhat soft at f\/4. This softness is gone at f\/5.6 which is the optimal aperture.
\nMidframe: f\/4 is significantly worse than f\/5.6 \u00a0which is the opimal value
\nCorner: soft at f\/4 they reach acceptable sharpness once stopped down.<\/p>\n

\"10056541563_1f40540d01_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

70mm_f8_SEL1670F4Z_FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"10056479855_28cb6719c7_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

70mm f8 SEL1670F4Z FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

\"9965099143_f3138dd015_c.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

70mm f\/5.6 SEL1670Z FullResolution<\/a> by reevedata<\/a>, on Flickr<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

If we look at the sharpness of the images we get mixed results: The center sharpness is excellent at all focal lenghts, only above 50mm I would stop down to f\/5.6 for best results.
\nThe corners are not very good at\u00a0the wide end\u00a0of the focal range, demanding landscape photographers won’t be happy with this performance.<\/p>\n

Photographers who do not print big\u00a0will like the lens a lot as a great one lens solution: It is fast, small, versatile and the images are very punchy. And the OSS is a handy feature.<\/p>\n

I have since reviewed the Zeiss 4\/24-70 on my Alpha 7 and I had much more fun with the SEL1670z which is probably the reason why I got better results out of it.<\/p>\n

The biggest weaknesses of the lens I see is the really steep price, if it was priced at 600$\/\u20ac\u00a0I would recommend it to every one.
\n<\/span>At the current price one has to consider whether it’s worth it. After all the kit lenses are not that much worse optically.<\/span><\/p>\n

Affiliate Links<\/strong><\/p>\n

It took me many hours to\u00a0complete this review, if you would like to support my blog please consider using one of my affiliate links:<\/p>\n

Zeiss 4\/16-70 at Amazon.com<\/a> | Amazon.de<\/a><\/p>\n

Some more samples<\/strong><\/p>\n

You can find more samples by visiting my flickr account<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Even more samples <\/strong><\/p>\n

These are optimized for web-display and can\u2019t be enlarged.<\/p>\n

\"9970961184_d332e21489_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"9977752715_1cd4358222_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"9977892343_ea487dbe7d_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"9977892843_dc895122e2_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"10001611294_a046177aa3_o.jpg\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Other interesting articles<\/h1>\n

Sony 4\/24-70 Review<\/a><\/p>\n

Manual lenses on the Sony Alpha 7 – A beginners guide<\/a><\/p>\n

This site contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase using any of the links marked as affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the creation of future content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Introduction The Carl Zeiss 16-70mm 1:4 made by Sony is an expensive standard lens for the Nex \/ APS-C E-mount line of cameras. It combines a very useful focal range with a decent moderate speed and size. All in all I think it is an interesting lens but it has some weaknesses which will … Continue reading Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lenses"],"yoast_head":"\nCarl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"phillipreeve.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-11-15T21:20:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-04-21T14:08:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Phillip Reeve\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Phillip Reeve\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/\",\"name\":\"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-11-15T21:20:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-04-21T14:08:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d875e9fd60a43e24a1abc265963ed021\"},\"description\":\"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"phillipreeve.net\",\"description\":\"Sony \u03b1 | Leica M | Nikon Z\/F New articles every week\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d875e9fd60a43e24a1abc265963ed021\",\"name\":\"Phillip Reeve\",\"description\":\"I have two hobbies: Photography and photographic gear. Both are related only to a small degree.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.phillipreeve.net\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Phillip_Reeve\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/author\/phillipadmin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net","description":"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net","og_description":"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.","og_url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/","og_site_name":"phillipreeve.net","article_published_time":"2013-11-15T21:20:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-04-21T14:08:23+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Phillip Reeve","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Phillip Reeve","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/","url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/","name":"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review - phillipreeve.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg","datePublished":"2013-11-15T21:20:41+00:00","dateModified":"2024-04-21T14:08:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d875e9fd60a43e24a1abc265963ed021"},"description":"For this review I used the very handy Zeiss 4\/16-70 a lot and compared it to several other popular e-mount lenses.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/farm6.staticflickr.com\/5460\/9922599423_77816c68ee_o.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/carl-zeiss-e-416-70-za-oss-for-sony-nex-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Carl Zeiss E 4\/16-70 ZA OSS for Sony Nex Review"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/","name":"phillipreeve.net","description":"Sony \u03b1 | Leica M | Nikon Z\/F New articles every week","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d875e9fd60a43e24a1abc265963ed021","name":"Phillip Reeve","description":"I have two hobbies: Photography and photographic gear. Both are related only to a small degree.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.phillipreeve.net","https:\/\/x.com\/Phillip_Reeve"],"url":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/author\/phillipadmin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54870,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions\/54870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/phillipreeve.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}