Tripods for Mirrorless Cameras

Introduction

tripods mirrorless cameras velbon gitzo manfrotto sirui rrs kirk markins a7rii a7s

When it comes to tripods mirrorless cameras have different requirements than DSLRs and so you can often get by with a lighter tripod. Unfortunately there are many manufacturers to chose from and even more commercial claims which are often misleading. As I have not only used quite a few myself but also witnessed the joy and frustation people experienced with their tripods during my workshops, I want to share my experiences with you.

Choosing a tripod

tripods mirrorless cameras gitzo series 1 traveler ocean gk1582ot gk1581ot gt1544t gt1542t gt1545t
Whilst many mirrorless cameras offer an “electronic first curtain shutter” most of the DSLRs are limited to a purely mechanical shutter

There is a huge difference when using cameras with an electronic first curtain shutter (EFC) or cameras with a purely mechanical shutter.
What is an electronic first curtain shutter? Imagine it as a theatrical performance: at the beginning the curtain opens and at the end it closes. With digital sensors it is possible to do this purely electronical: the software tells the sensor “now the exposure begins” (first curtain) and “now it ends” (second curtain).
Mechanical shutters may lead to vibration which can be a problem with the first curtain. With the second this is not that much of a problem, as you are already done with gathering light and you won’t see this vibration in the photo anymore.
Every camera from the A7 series except for the first gen A7r has an EFC (which is also activated by default) so the following recommendations assume you are using a camera with EFC, as it means we don’t need a tripod as stable as without.
I will only cover tripods and ballheads to be used with lenses up to 200mm as this is the area I can rely on my own experience. With longer lenses the advantages of mirrorless cameras start to diminish and the lens will absolutely govern the tripod choice.

If you don’t want to learn about the basics of choosing a tripod or a head for your tripod you can skip most of the article and scroll down to the recommended kits 🙂

Lection 1: Do not trust advertising claims

The most important thing is: the maximum load capacity nearly every manufacturer gives for it’s tripods is absolutely meaningless. There is no standard to measure it, many manufacturers are just giving you the breaking load while a few more honest manufactures will give the maximum load you can comfortably work with (whatever that means). You just can’t compare these values between different manufacturers.
What is really important when choosing a tripod is the maximum focal length you want to use. There are only two manufactures I know of (Gitzo and RRS) that will tell you what tripod (class) is suitable for a given maximum focal length.

What are you willing to carry?

tripods for mirrorless cameras
There are many different tripods made from different materials (wood, aluminum, basalt, carbon fiber) available

This is the first question you should be asking yourself. If the best tripod you have is the tripod at home because it is too big and heavy to carry around it is completely useless. You should also consider how you want to carry it. Dedicated tripod bags look nice at first sight, but strawling through a city with two bags is something best avoided (I am speaking from my own experience here).
Many shoulder bags only have very poor options for carrying a tripod. You have to take the tripod out of the bag to get to the camera? Bad idea. You have to take the tripod out of the bag each time you want to change lenses? Bad idea.
I am most happy with strapping light tripods to the side of a backpack or using very small tripods (see my recommendations at the end of this article) that can fit into my shoulder bags (or backpack).

Lection 2: You get what you pay for

Chimping on a tripod is the worst thing you can do with your money. A good tripod will outlive your camera and even your lenses if handled with care. I often get to hear the argument “I don’t need an expensive tripod because I am not using it very often”. Yeah sure, but because it sucks big time using a junk tripod you will use it even less often than you thought you would and end up not using it at all which will end up in all those noisy handheld nightshots I get to see on flickr every day.

There is a difference between price and value: I could buy a used Gitzo tripod today for 400$ and sell it in 5 years for 350$. I could also buy some “generic professional carbon fiber tripod” for 100$ which is neither stable nor a joy to use and try to sell it in 5 years. Is the company still around? Are there any spare parts available? Does anyone remember Triopo which was “hot” 5 years ago?  Will anyone be willing to give you even 50$ for it?

Lection 3: All that glitters is not gold

Unfortunately even the reknown companies often also produce junk tripods for the mass market so it is somewhat hard to recommend manufacturers in general but you might want to look what the following have to offer:
Gitzo (no junk at all)
Reallyrightstuff (no junk at all)
Feisol (no junk at all)
Manfrotto (former Bogen in US, also some cheap junk)
Velbon (also some cheap junk, Geo, Sherpa, UT, Ultra, Ultra TR worth a look)
Novoflex (Triopod worth a look)

Choosing a Ballhead

arca swiss markins rrs ballheads ball head aspheric aspherical ellipitic gitzo quick release
Arca Swiss P0 with Novoflex Q=Mount | Velbon QHD-43D with Neewer 25 | Sunwayfoto FB28i-DDH

I will only cover ballheads here as I think they are the best allround solution and also the most common type of heads. I am also not covering super telephoto or macro work here, these disciplines have their very own requirements.
I am interested in good build quality, little to no drift when locking the ball and no sag when having the camera locked for a longer period of time. Oh, I have also become quite the fan of aspheric balls which are not perfectly round but have an elliptical shape instead. The benefit here is, the more you tilt the camera the resistance of the ball is increased which counteracts the moment of eccentricity which derives from the load not being directly above the ballhead. This might have sounded a bit technical now, but to make a long story short: after having used a ballhead with an aspheric ball once I never wanted something else again.

Lection 4: Smaller isn’t cheaper

A bigger ballhead incorporating a ball with a bigger diameter will always be more stable than a smaller one, all else equal. Another problem is, making a ballhead smaller with the same function set (panorama function, dedicated friction knob etc.) does often not reduce the price substantially. Just take a look at the Novoflex CB3-II* and it’s newer small brother the Novoflex CB2* and you know what I am talking about (both are very nice ballheads by the way). This might also be the reason some well known manufactures don’t even bother offering smaller ball heads (I am thinking of Arca Swiss and Markins here).
* affiliate links

Nevertheless I have tried some light ballheads worth mentioning and want to share my experience with them:

Arca Swiss P0*:
This is one of the best pieces of gear I have ever bought. The rotating panorama plate ist where it belongs (on top) the handling is superb with a ring for locking you can’t miss, it is rather lightweight at ~305g (without a quick release system) and has a comparatively big aspherical ball.
You can’t go wrong with this one for lenses up to 200mm (even heavier ones), but it is also the biggest and heaviest head I will mention here and also quite expensive. Nevertheless: Heartily recommended.

Velbon QHD-43D*:
When I first saw it my expectations weren’t that high but this one proved to be a decent performer with exceptionally low weight (124g without quick release system). There is just one big wing screw but it is easily possible to control the friction with it before locking the ball. Recommended for lenses up to 90mm.

SunwayFoto FB-28i*:
Like the P0 this design also incorporates an aspheric ball and right now this is my preferred choice for using with my Sony cameras as it is quite small and very light (163g) and therefore a great fit for all the traveler tripods with foldable legs. You can control the friction with the big screw knob before locking the ball on this one as well and it works very well. Recommended for lenses up to 135mm.

What I haven’t used yet

I got word the smaller RRS heads are also very good but they are very expensive in Germany which is one of the reasons I didn’t get a chance to test them yet.
I have yet to use one of the Markins heads, but right now they are all too big for my needs.
I don’t yet know what to think of the Sirui products. Some people talk smack about these, others complain about sample variation. The prices have risen recently and I think they are quite ambitious by now. Things like spare parts supply are still a big question mark for me,  so right now I am not really interested in their products. YMMV.

Lection 5: You can’t afford to buy cheap

I have used – and seen people use – some low level “no name” and/or generic heads that come with all kinds of “brand”names and I wouldn’t waste my money on them. They have often questionable build quality like rubber grips on the screws that come of, significant drift when locking the ball, are unusable with gloves on, get stiff when it is freezing cold, the list goes on and on…
Be smart, don’t waste your money on junk. You get what you pay for, this is especially true for tripods and ballheads.

Quick Release Systems

A bunch of Arca Swiss compatible stuff markins sirui novoflex castel-q mengs pan-0 l-bracket sunwayfoto rrs bpns benro
A bunch of Arca Swiss compatible stuff

You should definetly think about getting a quick release system and by “a system” I mean an Arca Swiss compatible system which has become pretty much the standard now. You ask why?

  • You want camera specific L-brackets (which I would recommend): only available for Arca Swiss.
  • You want to replace your tele lenses’ foot with something more stable and compatible to your quick release system: only available for Arca Swiss.
  • You want small camera plates for your compact and use the same system for your 800mm lens? Only possible with Arca Swiss.

The problem here is: the standard isn’t really a standard. Although there is a host of manufactures using it (RRS, Novoflex, Markins, Gitzo (sometimes), Manfrotto (sometimes), Sirui, Sunwayfoto, Kirk, Benro, Mengs, Neewer and many more) not every plate is compatible with every clamp. I recommend quick release clamps with a screw knob as they have much less compatibility issues than the ones with flip locks.

Recommended Kits

There are numerous combinations of tripods, heads and quick release systems that could or could not work for you. I could never possibly cover all of them so I want to show you just some kits instead that worked for me or some of my closest friends. I have first hand personal experience with all of these kits, otherwise I wouldn’t recommend them. All of them are Arca Swiss compatible.
All affiliate links are marked with a *.

City trip “in the bag” tripod

velbon travel tripod trunnion shaft smalles travel tripod kleinstes reisestativ
Velbon UT-43D II with QHD-43D and Neewer 25mm

Velbon UT 43D II Kit* (includes QHD-43D head) + Neewer 25mm*
Folded length: 26.5 cm
Maximum height: 154 cm (including ballhead)
Weight: 1085g
This is my preferred choice for city trips as this tripod easily fits in my backpack and even some shoulder bags. I don’t like walking through a city with a big tripod on my backpack annoying other people and looking like a mugworthy photographer. On the other hand I don’t like taking shots of cityscapes without a tripod and this is where this Velbon comes into play.
The downsides are that it isn’t the most stable tripod out there (I recommend spreading the legs a bit for additional stability) and that it can’t be disassembled for cleaning, so I wouldn’t use it in (sea) water and especially sand.
Still: very usable for lenses up to 90mm (beware of (strong) wind though).

Lightweight outdoor tripod

manfrotto befree carbon tripod aluminium tripods mirrorless cameras compact compactness travel
Manfrotto befree (aluminium version) with Neewer 25mm

Manfrotto Befree Carbon* / Manfrotto Befree Aluminum* + Neewer 25mm*
Folded length: 40.5 cm
Maximum height:  143 cm (including ballhead)
Weight: 1095g (carbon) / 1440g (aluminium)
For the cost of a longer folded length you can get rid of the disadvantages of the aforementioned Velbon at roughly the same weight. The befree can be easily disassembled for cleaning and you can simply order spare parts at manfrottospares.com.
If weight isn’t your main concern you might want to settle for the aluminium version which is 345g heavier but also ~100 bucks cheaper. Both versions are usable for lenses up to 135mm.

The luxury travel tripod

tripods mirrorless cameras gitzo series 1 traveler ocean gk1582ot gk1581ot gt1544t gt1542t gt1545t
Gitzo GK1582OT (similar in size and shape to GT1544T) + Sunwayfoto FB28i-DDH

Gitzo GT1544T* / Gitzo GT1545T* + SunwayFoto FB-28i* + Sunwayfoto DDH-06 (also available as Kit FB28i-DDH)
Folded length:  43 cm / 43 cm
Maximum height: 149 cm / 161 cm (both including ballhead)
Weight:  1230g / 1300g
In terms of build quality but also stability these are the best travel tripods money can buy. The GT1545T is the latest version with the newest leg locks which are a little shorter than the older ones which results in an increased maximum height. Personally I prefer the locks  of the last generation so I included the GT1544T here as you might get a good deal on these now.
As head I choose the Sunwayfoto FB28i-DDH which is the smallest head I know of which offers an aspheric ball and is also equipped with the smallest panorama plate (Ø 50mm) I know of which even fits between the legs when folded.
Gitzo recommends these tripods for lenses up to 135mm (up to 200mm with reservations (like center column retracted)) and I would second that.

Further Reading

The following two tabs change content below.
My name is Bastian and for many years I have been mostly shooting Nikon DSLRs. As of today I have made my transition from Nikon to Sony and I am mainly using small but capable manual lenses. My passion is landscape photography but I also like to delve into other subjects from time to time.

Latest posts by BastianK (see all)

38 thoughts on “Tripods for Mirrorless Cameras”

  1. Hi,
    Nice article Bastian.
    So you have any recommend for a panoramic head system especially for MRL camera
    Thanks

          1. This novoflex slim is the system I’ve got; it’s not too heavy for travel and is very well made.

            I think I’d go for a bushman Sandbug as the other sensible quality multi row head for A7

  2. Dear authors,

    Do any of you have experience with tripods and air travel? I have a Sirui t-005x and will be going to Lisbon on budget airlines. Not sure how to take it. I don’t have checked luggage, I know on the way there I can check my carryon for free with ryanair, keeping my camera bag. With the return trip I fly Vueling and am not sure if they allow checking carryon luggage for free. Is it too risky to try and get it through airport security by carryon?

    1. I have no experience with Portugal but had no problems with a travel tripod as carry on baggage so far in: Germany, UK, USA, Canary Islands, Iceland.
      But it ultimately comes down to the security guy at the airport.

      1. Ok, so you risk your tripod? Going from your experience with all those countries I will probably just try it, if the tripod doesn’t make it I have a good excuse to get me a Gitzo 🙂 Is this only with the Velbon or did you take bigger ones as well in carry on through security?

        1. Yes. US and Iceland was a Gitzo Series 2 Traveler tripod. I checked with the TSA and also the german border patrol before though. Your Sirui is so small, this should not be a problem.

    2. Greetings. Be careful when evaluating this Sirui tripod…though they evidently make quality products, I would NOT recommend ANY tripod with a fixed (Non-extendable) center column! A camera is at its LEAST STABLE on such a tripod! For travel, check out promaster XC522 or Oben AT3535, among others. Good luck!

  3. Hi Bastian,

    I went the somewhat more expensive way (I wanted to avoid a center column because of rigidity concerns – as do the Gitzo Systematic or RRS tripods):

    Feisol Tournament CT-3442 Rapid
    Acratech GPS Ballhead (very small & light!)

    Not cheap, as I said, but it can also handle FF-DSLRs and small teles without problems (like 300/F4).

    1. This is a very nice setup indeed!
      If I come across that Arcatech head I will definetly have a closer look, didn’t yet know it is available with a smaller diameter.

  4. Hi Bastian,
    Thanks for interesting review.
    I am looking for L-bracket for my a7 II and it looks like you are using the one I am interested in. Have two questions regarding Sunwayfoto L-bracket:
    Are those centering marks useful and accurate enough?
    When in vertical position on the tripod – is this part long enough to hold firmly the camera? (it seems very short compared to bottom part)
    Regards

  5. Can you recommend any mono pod with legs? Sometimes I like to use one for panoramic photos, provide some kind of stability. Carrying a tripod might not be allowed in some places. Just look too professional, or get in the way of other people.

    1. I do own a heavy duty monopod which I mainly use with long lenses.
      I tried a few shorter lenses with it, but honestly I saw very little to no improvement over hand held shooting.
      I would rather get a very small tripod like one of these instead.

      1. Thank you, I bought the Manfratto Pocket today. I have already kind of semi permanently attached it to my Sony A77. It balances well with the 16-50 SSM that came with the body. Now I just need to find some sturdy platform to place the camera. I shoot a lot of flowers too. When using my 50mm 2.8 macro lens at low positions, that should come in handy.

  6. Hi Bastian,
    Thanks for the review.
    Have you heard or even used a Cullmann Concept One 622T(C)?
    I am looking for a lightweight travel tripod, the Manfrotto Befree looks good except it doesn’t have a weight hook, and I’m not sure if it is stable enough for such a lightweight tripod. (I am using a A7II, the heaviest lens I got is the Makro-Planar 60/2.8, maybe a Helios 40-2 later which is ~800g w/o an adapter)
    Then I found this 622T(C) which has a similar weight and size, but has only a few reviews out there.
    Also, what do you think about detachable monopod? I see it becomes a trend for a travel tripod. Is there any disadvantage of it? Thanks.

    1. Dear Chester,
      when looking for a lightweight tripod for myself I also came across that Cullmann tripod.
      I can assure you it is less stable than the Manfrotto Befree.
      Stay away from cheap carbon fiber tripods with 5 leg segments.
      Even some for 400$ are junk, I am looking at you 3 legged thing tripods with center columns “featuring” 2 or even 3 segments.
      Stay away from tripods with detachable monopods. They make the tripod less stable (additional connection) and they are too short to use them for anything.

  7. Hi Bastian

    I have a before aluminium, and would like to know if it can be fully closed after setting up the neewer 25mm on it?

    Thanks!

  8. Hi Bastian,

    I wondered if you have any experience of the Sunwayfoto FB-36III ball head. I upgraded from a Velbon travel tripod with a 4-way tilt and swivel head to a Sirui W2204, and I’m looking to pair it with a suitably sized head for my Sony mirrorless cameras and lenses up to 200mm. I’ve tried the Sirui K20X but unfortunately there’s significant shift when locking the head down. I’ve read a comment from a customer on amazon.com suggesting that the Sunwayfoto does not suffer from this issue. Any thoughts?

    1. Unfortunately I did not yet have a chance to test the FB-36III personally.
      With the FB-28 I did not yet encounter such issues, but I am not using it with very long lenses or at macro distances, where this can be more apparent.

  9. I tested the Manfrotto befree after I read this article but I found it only sturdy when I left the outer two leg segments and the middle column retracted. The wind made it visibly wobble when fully extended. I compared it to a Cullmann 525 (without monopod) which is much more stable (70cm stowing length and 2,5kg aren’t great for travelling, though).
    Am I too picky? Or do you also recommend max. exposure values for using those tripods? If yes: what are your tripod recommendations for long exposure shots?

    Thanks!

    1. Dear Mario,
      I don’t know how windy it was, but you certainly have to put some weight on the tripod in such situations.
      I also recommend spreading the legs a bit to put some initial pressure on them.
      Apart from that long exposures should be easily possible and are actually less demanding than something like 1/30 to 1/2s.

      1. Thank’s for the quick reply! Your comment about longer exposures being more forgiving makes sense.
        But I found it hard to put weight on the Manfrotto since it doesn’t have a hook.
        I bought a Sirui ET-1004 now, it’s practicly the same size and weight of the Manfrotto Befree but much more stable plus the included Ball Head allows for much more precise settings and the mount is already compatible to Arca Swiss which I switched to after I read your article. So big thanks for that, this system is just so much easier and faster to use, especially with the L mount.

    1. By my standards that one isn’t a travel tripod.
      The mountaineer range does not feature foldable legs, combined with only 3 leg sections we are talking about a folded length of 62cm + ballhead vs 43cm including ballhead.
      With only 3 leg sections it will be a little more stable though, but not enough that I would compromise on portability that much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *