Venus Optics is a new player in the field of high performance manual lenses. Their new Laowa Smooth Trans Focus 105mm F 2.0(T3.2) has a special apodization element which should give this lens extraordinary bokeh. That’s the theory, in this review I will put it to the test.
Most images in this review are linked to the full resolution, just click on them. There is also a Laowa STF 105mm F 2.0 flickr album.
Venus Optics loaned us the lens free of charge for a few weeks.
- Diameter: 75 mm
- Length: 126 mm (E-mount)
- Weight: 745g
- Filter Thread: 67 mm
- Number of Aperture Blades: 13 (f/2 to f/22) / 14 (T3.2 to T/8)
- Elements/Groups: 11/8
- Close Focusing Distance: 90 cm
- Mount: Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony FE
The Laowa 2/105 STF currently (July 2016) sells for $699 at ebay.com (affiliate link).
The Laowa Smooth Trans Focus 105mm F2.0 (T3.2) currently comes in EF, Nikon F and Sony FE mount.
What’s special about this lens?
The Laowa STF 105mm F2.0 has a special apodization element. This works like a ND filter so you get the depth of field of a f/2 lens but only the light transmission of a f/3.2 lens. Why would one want to put such an element into the lens? Well it makes the bokeh much smoother.
Venus Optics isn’t the first company to employ this technique. Minolta introduced the STF 135mm F2.8(T4.5) in 1999 which is today sold by Sony. I compared the Sony and the Laowa in this article.
The STF 2/105 is made from metal and feels very solid. Markings are engraved. There is no play in the focusing or the aperture rings.
I didn’t take it apart nor do I own a rentals company so I can’t tell you how reliable it actually is.
Size, Weight and Handling
The Laowa is a substantial lens and I prefer to have my L-bracket attached to the a7 for better handling. With L-bracket attached handling is good but because of the weight I would think twice about taking it for a longer walk.
The focusing ring is has a pleasant resistance and it travels about 270 degrees from 0.9m to infinity which is quite long and makes precise focusing very easy but also slows focusing down a bit. Compared to the most pleasant to use lenses I would have wished for a tad less resistance and a littler more direct transmission but it is still pleasant to use.
The Laowa actually has two aperture rings. The F-ring has click stops at full apertures and goes from f/2 to f/22. Unusually the distance between the stops get shorter. It is quite long between f/2 and f/2.8, about normal between f/5.6 and f/8 and very short between f/16 and f/22. The T-stop is clickless and goes from f/3.2 to f/8. Both rings affect depth of field and exposure and their effect on bokeh is very similar so as a videographer you will probably use the clickless one and as a photographer the one with clickstops makes more sense.
The Laowa STF 2/105 does not change it’s length when it is focused but it is not an internally focusing lens either, the whole optical block travels inside of the lens.
The original lens hood is made from plastics and feels solid enough but not as premium as the lens itself. Sadly though it isn’t very effective at suppressing flare and I often had to shade the front element with my other hand.
The 67mm filter thread is made from metal.
The front of the lens does not rotate.
At f/2 vignetting is moderate at 1.5 stops, at f/2.8 it is reduced to 0.9 and around 0.6 stops from f/4. This is an average performance for a semi fast lens of this focal lens.
You will also notice that there is a significant color shift from f/2 to f/2.8, WB is the same for all the images.
And now we come to the biggest weakness of the Laowa STF 2/105.
Ghosting happens only under the most extrem conditions and then it isn’t too strong:
Veiling flare though is a real issue and has cost me quite a few images.
Both images were taken with the lens hood attached but for the second image I shielded the front lens with my hand as well.
The lens shows almost zero distortion.
Lateral CA is very low but not perfectly corrected.
The Laowa STF 2/105 shows exceptional correction of LoCA. Here I compared it with the Zeiss 2/100 Makro Planar:
The Laowa’s background bokeh is very smooth. Here is a comparison with the Zeiss Makro Planar 2/100 which is known for it’s very good bokeh. You will note that the Laowa shows the cat-eye-effect to some degree but it isn’t as bad as with the Zeiss MP.
Is it as special as the Bokeh of the Sony STF 2.8/135? No it isn’t. The Sony draws highlights without any definition and there is no cat-eye effect:
The bad news is that the Laowa doesn’t handle the transition zone nearly as well as the background, it is actually quite rough there with a very visible outlining effect.
The foreground bokeh is very smooth again, maybe a little less so than the background bokeh but still very good. I don’t want to waste more space on it, just check out the many samples I have.
So in most scenarios like portraiture bokeh is really good but there are other scenarios where the bokeh can be quite ruff actually. In general I was very pleased with the Laowa’s bokeh.
I would guess that they started with a lens with rather busy bokeh and turned that into a lens with nice (background-)bokeh by adding the apodization element. Minolta’s STF 2.8/135 does have smoother bokeh in any scenario with zero vignetting which results in a look the Laowa can’t emulate.
13 aperture blades result in 26-pointed sunstars.
If you avoid veiling flare contrast is very high.
You can find the full resolution test images in the Laowa STF 2/105 flickr set.
f/2: Ver good sharpness in the center, good in the midframe area and corners.
f/2.8: Excellent in the center, good to very good in the rest of the frame.
f/4: Excellent in the center, very good across the frame.
f/5.6: A slight improvement in the corners.
f/8: Ever so slightly softer
For me the most important stops are:
- f/2.0: I used this aperture without hesitation for more than 9 in 10 images.
- f/5.6 for landscapes an stuff where I need sharpness across the frame.
Close Focus Performance
The Laowa STF 105mm F 2.0 is still quite sharp at it’s shortest focusing distance of 0.9m even when set to f/2.
The reproduction ratio is 0.16 which is about average for a 100mm lens.
Sony STF 135mm F 2.8(T4.5): The Sony has truly extraordinary bokeh but it is more expensive, slower and not built as nice plus the focusing isn’t very pleasant. Check out my in-depth comparison.
Samyang 2/135: The Samyang shares the Laowa’s excellent correction of axial CA and very high sharpness but it is a bit bigger and not built as nicely. It is a little cheaper and has a 1.5 stops higher transmission.
Zeiss Makro Planar 2/100: The Zeiss is a little more expensive if you buy used and a lot more expensive if you buy new. The Zeiss is a little sharper than the Laowa (it is in fact the sharpest lens I have ever used), can focus down to a reproduction ratio of 1:2 and while it’s flare resistance isn’t perfect it is much better than that of the Laowa. Of course you don’t lose the 1.5 stops of light with the Zeiss. Advantages of the Laowa are a much better correction of axial CA, a little smoother background bokeh and a better focusing experience.
Minolta MC 2.5/100: Certainly not as sharp but it is an affordable lens with great build quality and superb bokeh.
+ Excellent correction of axial CA
+ Very sharp from f/2
+ Very good background-bokeh
+ Good Build quality and handling
+ Almost zero distortion
o Size and Weight
– Very susceptible to flare
– The apodization element reduces the light transmission by 1.5 stops
– Nervous transition bokeh
Overall I am quite impressed by what Venus Optics has achieved with the Laowa STF 2/105. The lens is very sharp from f/2 and more surprisingly it corrects axial CA really well which is an issue with which many other expensive lenses struggle, the Zeiss Makro Planar 2/100 for example. I am quite surprised that this aspect isn’t advertised more, they could have called it an APO lens and it would have deserved that label.
The bokeh is very good, better than that of most of the competition but not as excellent as I would have expected from a lens which’s main selling point is the bokeh, especially the nervous transition zone bugs me. So if you look for a lens with good bokeh for portraits don’t hesitate to buy the Laowa, but don’t expect it to be radically different from what you have known before.
Build quality is very good and sets the Laowa apart from Samyang lenses, nothing to complain about here apart from that the lens is a little heavy and far from small. Handling misses the excellent mark by a little because the focusing ring has a little too long focus throw and the aperture ring works a little different but I am nitpicking here and all in all handling is very good.
The Laowa is very susceptible to veiling flare and I lost a couple of images to this issue which is always annoying. The lens hood isn’t very effective and it often makes sense to shield the front of the lens with your hand but this doesn’t help in every situation.
All things considered I think the price is very fair. You get a lens which aims at the premium segment and delivers well on this aim in most aspects but you don’t pay as much as the competition from Zeiss or Leica would charge for a lens with similar qualities. Of course one has to consider that Venus Optics is a young company which hasn’t had the time to prove the longevity of it’s products but so far I don’t see any issues.
So all in all I was a little underwhelmed by the Laowa’s main selling point, the bokeh. This was mostly because I had a very high expectations. I was very positively surprised by the Laowa STF 105mm f/2’s excellent correction of axial CA which have bothered me with every other portrait lens I have used so far. The trade-off you have to make for these desirable characteristics is that the Laowa flares very easily and that you lose 1.5 stops of light compared to a conventional lens. You don’t need to worry about any of the other aspects like sharpness, build quality etc., here Venus Optics delivers.
The Laowa STF 105mm f/2 currently (July 2016) sells for $699 at ebay.com (affiliate link).
If this review was helpful to you, please consider using one of my affiliate links. I will earn a small commission on your purchase and it won’t cost you anything. Thanks!
Laowa STF 105mm F 2.0 Sample Images
All images are processed in Lightroom from Raw. Many more full resolution samples in my Laowa STF 105mm F2.0 flickr album.
- Minolta Lenses on the Sony a7 – ratings, impressions and sample images
- Affordable manual lenses for the Sony Alpha 7 series
- Manual lenses on the Sony a7 – A beginners guide
Latest posts by Phillip Reeve (see all)
- Review: Samyang AF 75/1.8 FE - April 12, 2021
- The FE-List now has 113 lenses on it - March 25, 2021
- Announced: Voigtlander 35mm F2 Apo-Lanthar - February 15, 2021
23 thoughts on “Review: Laowa STF 105mm F2.0 (T3.2)”
“The lens hood isn’t much very effective”
You might want to lose a word there…
Just to add a comment that I have the Nikon f mount version, and it mounts a bit loose compared to other lenses on my nikon f4 and my adapters to Sony. I don’t think it’s a big problem. I do like the lens a lot, but due to size and weight issue I often carry the Nikon ai-s 105mm f2.5 instead. That lens is quite a classic and I look forward to you guys reviewing some old Nikkor later down the road.
I’m a bit unsure about this but on another review site they noted that the bokeh balls looked different whether you used the f stops or the T stops. As your comparison pics showed f2.0, I wonder if the bokeh comparison would have been different using the T stops instead since the aperture blades involved are not the same.
I didn’t look too closely but I saw only very minor differences. At t/2 both apertures are fully open anyway so there would be no difference.
hi, when used f2.0 i have seen the best shot always taken with a t-stop 3.2! try out. thanks for sharing
I don’t understand what you mean.
I purchased the canon version and used it on my 5D MK iii and was absolutely blown away by the sharpness @ f2 and the bokeh is also very nice. Lens flare is an issue. Even with the hood on you can under certsin circumstances experience flaring. The focusing ring takes some getting used to. Overall I am very happy with my purchase. In sharpness and bokeh it beats my Canon 100mm f2.8 hands down. The only saving grace for the Canon is it’s macro capability and IS. As I like shooting fully manual other advantages don’t matter
HI Phillip, I was thinking in get it (for my a7rii) but having the 90 macro 2.8 ,..mmhhh,…any Idea if it will outperform that excellent sony macro lens?
Well DOF will be a bit more shallow and CA correction a tad better but apart from that I don’t see much of an improvement.
I’m planning to pick one up for F mount soon. May I ask if you have any recommendations for an aftermarket hood that would lessen the flare without adding vignette? While the coatings are definitely an issue, by your demonstration of shielding the light with a hand, I think a deeper hood could be a more fixed solution.
I just had the lens for the duration of the review and so I only used the supplied one. I am not too optimistic that a better fitting hood would lessen the flare issue significantly.
Thank you for your response! I am almost set on this as a portrait lens as it seems to be a better option than the Nikon 105mm f2.5 and a good alternative to the extremely expensive Milvus 85mm f1.4 which I cannot afford.
May I also ask how this compares to the Samyang 85mm f1.4 AS IF UMC? From what I can gather, the Laowa is the sharper optic and is more flare prone. Past that, how would you compare their color, contrast, and saturation rendering? I understand you may not have had the opportunity to do side-by-side comparisons but from your general impressions of the two lenses, which produced better colors?
The Laowa is certainly sharper with a lot less CA. Regarding color:Here everybody sees different things and I have never come a across a very enlightening test and I used both lenses not that much with years in between so I don’t think I have anything useful I could say about it.
Thank you once again for a very prompt response! It is very much appreciated. Very lovely website you have built as well!
I want to buy one of these portrait lens:
– Nikon 135 DC f2.0 (from ebay)
– Nikon 105 f1.8 ais (from ebay)
– Laowa 105 STF f2.0 (brand new)
Is it Nikon 135 DC f2.0 is always the best among these three lens? Any suggestions?
None of us has personal experience with the Nikon 135mm 2.0 DC or the Nikon 105mm 1.8 Ais.
Nevertheless there never is a “best” lens.
The Laowa has most certainly the best loCA correction of the three.
The Nikon 105 has very busy bokeh compared to the other two.
The lenses are hardly comparable, not knowing what you want to do with them.
Take portrait photos. BTW, any examples of nervous transition bokeh?
Honestly, I would not get any of those lenses but the Canon EF 135mm 2.0L used instead.
These days it is much cheaper than it actually should be.
And depending on your camera even eye AF may work.