Specifications
- Diameter: 66mm
- Length: 68mm
- Weight: 415g
- Filter Diameter: 55mm
- Number of aperture blades: 6
- Close Focusing Distance: 0.3m
- Mount: Minolta SR
The Minolta MC 35mm 1:1.8 usually sells for around $115-160 at ebay.com (affiliate link).
In Germany you can buy it for 120-160€ at ebay.de (affiliate link).
Also check out my Minolta SR-mount adapter guide.
Sample images
Versions
The Minolta MC W.Rokkor-HH 1:1.8 f=35mm (exact inscription) was introduced in 1968 with a flat, all metal focusing ring (MC-I), in 1970 the focusing ring was updated to the hill and valley design (MC-II). The next update was the rubberized focusing ring (MC-X), you see it pictured in this review. Some MC-X lenses carry the HH in the name (which indicates that it is a 8 elements in 6 groups design), younger ones don’t.
All three versions use the same optical design and the only difference is the different design of the focusing ring.
The Minolta MD (W.Rokkor) 35mm 1:1.8 which was introduced in 1978 is much lighter and smaller, the optical design is also different.
Sharpness
You can find the full resolution test images in the Minolta MC 1.8/35 flickr set.
f/1.8: The resolution is quite high in the center and midframe region but due to spherical aberration contrast is quite low. The corners are soft.
f/2.8: Most of the image is very sharp and contrasty, midframe decent but the corners are soft.
f/4: Midframe and corner region improve a little.
f/5.6 and f/8: Best apertures for midframe sharpness, only the extreme corners are soft.
f/11: Best aperture for the extreme corners.
Comment
The Minolta MC 1.8/35 is not a lens you buy for it’s sharpness but for it’s character and great built quality.
At f/1.8 there is quite a lot of spherical aberration (especially at very close distances) so while images have quite a bit of detail they have a lower contrast and a bit of glow. Vignetting is very high at 2,6 stops and easily visible in most pictures. Bokeh is mostly smooth at short distances (where the lens is noticeably softer) and a bit funky at longer distances. The less than spectacular flare resistance is also a fact that you have to consider.
These are the reasons why I would call this a character lens. It can still produce very nice images but you will have an abundance of aberrations in the image.
Stop the 1.8/35 down to f/2.8 most of the aberrations are reduced a lot. Contrast and sharpness are good, the bokeh is smoother as well and vignetting is no longer an issue.
Sony a7 | Minolta MC Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8 | f/2.8 | full resolution
Sony a7 | Minolta MC Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8 | f/2.8 | full resolution
Sony a7 | Minolta MC Rokkor 35mm 1:1.8 | f/2.8 | full resolution
For landscape photography I would recommend f/5.6 or f/8 where only the extreme corners are soft, the rest of the image is very sharp and on the same level as e.g. the FE 4/16-35 ZA, the much smaller and cheaper 2.8/35 is a bit better. Vignetting is negligible and lateral CA moderate.
Typically for a Minolta MC lens built quality is great, it doesn’t get much better than this. The lens is made of nothing but metal and glass (well and some rubber for the focusing ring but it has aged very well). The focusing ring is a pleasure to use. The MC 1.8/35 is neither small nor light and handling on the Sony a7 series is still okay but certainly less pleasant than that of smaller lenses like the Minolta MD 2.8/35.
All in all I enjoyed using the Minolta MC 1.8/35 but that was more because of the aberrations, not because it is a technically good lens at f/1.8. Modern lenses like the Voigtlander 1.7/35 play in a different league. From f/2.8 it is a technically good lens but still not as good as the much smaller MD 2.8/35 or FD 2.8/35. So I would recommend it to those who like it’s character at f/1.8 but for most purposes a cheaper and smaller 2.8/35 will perform as good or better.
The Minolta MC 35mm 1:1.8 usually sells for around $115-160 at ebay.com (affiliate link).
In Germany you can buy it for 120-160€ at ebay.de (affiliate link).
If this review was helpful to you, please consider using one of my affiliate links. I will earn a small commission on your purchase and it won’t cost you anything. Thanks!
More sample images
More full resolution images can be found in my Minolta MC 1.8/35 flickr set.
Further Reading
- Minolta Lenses on the Sony a7 – ratings, impressions and sample images
- My other Minolta MC/MD Reviews
- Affordable manual lenses for the Sony Alpha 7 series
This site contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase using any of the links marked as affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the creation of future content.
Latest posts by Phillip Reeve (see all)
- Review: Samyang AF 75/1.8 FE - April 12, 2021
- The FE-List now has 113 lenses on it - March 25, 2021
- 2020 – Year’s end review - December 28, 2020
I really like your reviews. You are the reason I bought a Sony camera and canon FD lenses and I love them. Thank You!
you are very welcome 🙂
Why you’re calling it quick review, can it not be seriously and slow?
Well it is shorter (but not less serious) than my usual reviews so I felt like it the title should reflect that.
I like ur review about the Lens u use in ur Sony Camera…still thinking if l will buy Sony Camera or other brand like canon or nikon camera…now l know l can still use some of Lenses of my old cameras like Minolta, Nikon & Pentax…thanks so much & thanks too for sharing ur pix,,,
Just ordered a copy of this lens to compare with my MD 35/2.8. Curious to see how they measure up. I like the larger build of it, and am hoping it has that charismatic glow that I love from my MC 55/1.7. By the sounds of your review, it definitely does have the same glow and “charm” wide open as the 55/1.7. I really like the 35/2.8, but find that it’s very “clinical” and basic wide open, and I like to have more character in my shots. I had the legendary 58/1.2 for a couple months but never used it because I preferred the 55/1.7’s “look” over it. Crazy, but true!
Anyway, thanks so much for all your great reviews and info. You’ve been a huge help to me and my filmmaking/photography work! You should check out the music video I shot using mostly Minolta lenses on Sony cameras.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7N67_pVpRGQ
Cheers!
I think you will like the lens 🙂
Can you explain what you mean by “character” please?
Phillip
Great review! I love the information, it has greatly helped my decision making, and also discovering the possibilities of these fine sony a7 cameras. I do have a question regarding the differences between lenses… What would be the difference between the Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm 1:2.8, and the Minolta MC W.Rokkor HG 35mm f2.8? I’m in the middle of purchasing one from eBay and really don’t know which one is better in terms of build quality and image quality. Your input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Jorge
The MC is probably the older 7 lenses version and I have only tested the younger one with 5 lenses. Build quality should be smiliar.
Yes, it is a beautifully made and characteristic lens. Nice to see this ‘fresh’ review. I have one for sale, converted to Minolta/Sony AF bayonet and chip.
laptoprob at zonnet dot nl
hope you don’t mind my advertising… thanks!
Phillip
I think I may go with the Minolta MC W Rokkor – HH 1.8 – f = 35mm serial number 1102805. Is there a way to tell what year it was made by the serial number? I’m a bit of a sucker for the older stuff lately 🙂
Thank you
Not as far as I know
I got that from thrift store last year! It is old but it’s sturdy! I did not test that because I have to buy fotodoix adapter for my 5D Mark II. I am curious. Is that will work for Minolta MC W. Rokkor-x 1.8 35mm?
won’t work with a simple adapter on any Canon DSLR
I had a copy of the first generation 35mm f/1.8 lens, and also a 100 mm f/2.5 lens, dating from about 1969 or so. They may have been part of the first batch shipped to the U.S, and had those metal focusing rings. I shot hundreds of rolls of B&W film in college on them. I wish I still had those lenses, but they were stolen over the years.
that sucks! I younger than most lenses I use, must be a different feeling when you have such a personal connection to a lens
I like the review I feel it is well done my old 35:MC 1.8 died years ago to some type of fungus in the lens so I gave it to someone who thought they could fix it the lens was not used much by me so I didn’t replace it so my 45mm lens saw more action and I soon for got about the 35mm lens
Tried the Minolta MD (W.Rokkor) 35mm 1:1.8 on my Sony 7r. Wasn’t that great. It lacks in Resolution – even at f11… I believe the 7r is not very forgiving here.
Otherwise my new Tokina 90mm 2,5 is very good and can serve the high resolution Sensor well.
Hi Phillip
Based on image quality, performance, and build quality what would you say would be the better of the two between the 35mm in this review vs the 50mm 1.4 mc rocker-pg? I’m thinking about selling one of them. Your input is very appreciated
Thank you
The 50 is the better performer, build quality is pretty much the same
My suggestion, if you want to experiment with the Minoltas, is to try the last optical iteration of the MD 35mm/f.2.8 along with a late MD 50mm/f.1.4, especially if your budget is tight. I have this pair in excellent, clean condition — zero fungus, etc. — and have $48 plus minimal shipping cost sunk into the pair after auction wins. I can’t complain there; and tentatively speaking, I think the late Minoltas may provide a less dated looking rendering than do the economical Canon FD’s. The Canon FDn 50mm/f.1.4 has its own advantages, in this case, which might be useful; so I have one of these as well to experiment with.
Hi Phillip! Been LOVING your reviews on the minolta’s! Thank you so much for this excellent resource! I am building a set of these old minolta lenses currently, (I have the 45mm f/2, 55 f/1.7, and the 58 f/1.2)….I”m curious how do you think this 35 f/1.8 compares to the minolta 28mm f/2? Trying to decide which to get between those two? My standard focal length for this minolta set im building will be the 45 (i tend to shoot on the wider end). Thanks!
I think the MC 2/28 is technically a bit weaker and less smooth in rendering than the MC 1.8/35 but it would make more sense with a 45mm lens.
This is probably my favorite manual focus SLR lens. I used to shoot Minolta back in the day, and then moved to Canon DSLR and now to Canon RF mirrorless. Recently I bought avery clean Minolta X-700 and caught the film bug, bad.
In a matter of two months I’ve accumulated each of my favorite Minolta film bodies that I’d lusted after in the 70s and 80s, and built a collection of all of my favorite lenses with only two missing, the MD 20/2.8 and MC 58/1.2, both of which I’m sure I’ll get eventually.
Whether shot natively on a Minolta film body or adapted to my Canon R5 or R5, these lenses are a delight, and the MC W.Rokkor-HH 35mm f/1.8 is by far my favorite. Your review is spot on, it isn’t exceptionally sharp and it likes to flare, but there is a certain magic in how it draws.
My 45 megapixel R5 clearly demands more resolution that this (or any of my vintage Minolta lenses except for maybe the MD 35mm f/2.8 at f/5.6, but no matter, they all look great.
I think the biggest surprise was how much I like this lens (and the MC 50mm f/1.4) on the APSC sensor R50. The soft corners aren’t an issue, but that beautiful low-contrast vintage rendering and gorgeous vintage Minolta color really come through.