Introduction
When using Leica M cameras I generally try to stick to using small lenses, but there is a problem: small lenses are usually slow and I find slow lenses (at least non-ultrawides) incredibly boring.
My workaround is using some of the MS-Optics lenses as they try to be small, lightweight and fast at the same time – at the cost of some optical compromises obviously.
I was a bit hesitant to use these lenses on film at first (doubts about rangefinder accuracy, focus shift and field curvature) but I decided to try nevertheless and exposed 4 films mainly using the 24mm 2.0 Aporia and the 50mm 1.0 ISM. How did it work out in the end? Let’s have a look.
24mm 2.0 Aporia
The 24mm 2.0 Aporia has a working infinity hard stop, even though the rangefinder patch doesn’t align perfectly here. The lens focuses down to 0.5 m, but the closest distance the rangefinder coupling actually works at is ~1.0 m.
I tried with the M10 before and got the feeling the rangefinder coupling is accurate enough between 1.0 m to 3.0 m even at f/2.0 and at longer focus distances I can simply use the infinity hard stop and will most likely use the lens stopped down anyway.
As you can see from the pictures I mainly used this lens stopped down for landscape/architecture shooting and on film it performed surprisingly well.
Even looking at the extreme corners it is hard to find a flaw with its performance, quite remarkable for a quirky 24mm lens the size of a lens cap.
50mm 1.0 ISM
As already pointed out in my review of the 50mm 1.0 ISM I consider this a rather mediocre f/1.0, but a decent f/1.4 lens. I found out how to adjust its rangefinder coupling so calibrated it myself to give best possible results at f/1.4.
I carried a 3-stop ND filter to be able to use it at wider apertures despite the M6’s 1/1000s fastest shutter speed limitation.
The lens has some issues with field curvature and I was a bit afraid this may lead to some focus errors at wider apertures and this is what happened. Some of the pictures that look fine in low resolution here don’t look that great even at screen size.
With the point of focus close to the center of the frame I have sometimes been positively surprised though.
What did I learn?
Using the 24mm stopped down worked quite well actually. I didn’t use an external finder and usually framed being aware that there will be some more legroom to crop if a slight tilt is needed to level the horizon.
As this lens is so tiny and because of the position of the focus lever I managed to have my finger in six of the pictures I took with it though, ah well…
With the 50mm I expected I was in for a wild ride and I haven’t been disappointed. It is simply not a good idea to use focus and recompose with fast lenses having field curvature issues. For lower resolution images things mostly look fine, but better not look too close.
In the future I will consider more thoroughly which lenses to use on the analogue camera and in which situations to pick it in the first place though.
Especially when it gets darker the image quality that can be achieved with a digital camera is so clear and so far ahead of what analogue can do, it is staggering.
Further Reading
Support Us
Did you find this article useful or just liked reading it? Treat us to a coffee or a roll of film!
via Paypal
Latest posts by BastianK (see all)
- Analogue Adventures – Part 37: Santa Color 100 - December 15, 2024
- Review: Voigtländer VM 35mm 1.5 Nokton - December 7, 2024
- Review: Sony FE 24-50mm 2.8 G - December 4, 2024
Looks like honeymoon. Congratulatuions – if I’m not wrong.
Anyway, great photos and write-up as always. Best wishes!
Primarily wedding, very little honeymoon…
But thank you very much nevertheless 🙂
Which’s more fun – M10 or M6? (assuming that you’d get film/dev/scans) for free.
Difficult question, as in terms of usability the cameras are very similar.
I am not overly happy with the image quality film is giving though.
I’ve been getting pretty good results with DSRL scanning. Maybe you could try it out!
Great series! Very informative overall!
Sounds like somebody needs a Mamiya 7!😄
Jokes aside, I have really been enjoying this foray into film photography. Keep it up!
When it comes to medium format film I think I would be more of a Hasselblad 500C guy 🙂
Gratulation to your wedding! You couldn’t resist to take some photos on your own wedding, I recognize 😊.
You know the saying: if you want something done right, you gotta do yourself 🙂
Nice wedding, congrats 🙂 So lovely photos. Such a clean look and not ruined by strange Photoshop presets typically used for weddings. Those lenses look gorgeous, thou I think for you lenses and cameras do not matter much. You can take those beautiful pictures with any equipment.
Congratulations for your wedding!… Make a wonderful couple with many thousand pictures to come!… and maybe more…
Thank you very much!
Congratulations on your wedding! And all your shots are just lovely – well composed. It shows that if youre a seasoned photographer – any lens will provide the shot despite imperfections. My favourite lens of all time is the Leitz Summaron 35/2.8 for Leica M. It’s perfectly sharp where it matters, but it’s the imperfections that give me that “magic”in the photographs. Thanks for sharing your project.
Thanks Jose!
Hello Bastian,
I hope you enjoyed your wedding and I wish you all the best for the future…
I am a great fan of the great little lenses made by Mr. Miyazaki. I own already the Apoqualia 2/28, the ISM 1/50, the Sonnetar 1,5/73, the Perar 4,5/17 and now I managed to get my hands on the Apoqualia 1,4/35mm (first generation).
This lens is said to be the best lens designed and manufactured by Mr. Miyazaki. After having tested it so far, I can confirm that. This lens is really usable at full aperture und it gets really sharp and contrasty allover, when stopped down a little bit.
It has a very busy bokeh at f/1,4, but in terms of sharpness and contrast it is on par with the the Summicron M 2/35mm Type 4. So if you should get the chance reviewing this lens, you won`t be disappointed…
Anyway, I always love reading your reviews of the MS-Optics lenses and I will continue reading them in the future, because your wonderfull fotos always inspire me.
So please keep on reviewing!
Best regards, Christian
Accidentally I am currently looking to get one of the first gen 35mm 1.4, whether that will work out is another story though 🙂
I have good news for you: I am working on reviews for both, the 35mm 1.4 as well as the 35mm 1.3.
Hello Bastian,
this are really good news. I am looking forward to your upcoming review of this two lenses. I own both lenses, too but I don`t want to spoiler anything, so I will be quiet and wait untill your review is done… 😉
Best regards, Christian