The Canon EF 135mm 2.0L is often referred to as being the “Lord of the Red Rings” and many think it is one of the – if not the – best and sharpest among all L-lenses. On the other hand the optical design dates back more than 20 years now, so let us find out how the lens performs when coupled with the 42mp A7rII!
Specifications / Version History
There has been a Canon FD 135mm 2.0 with a simpler optical design in the past, apart from that the current EF 135mm 2.0L is on the market since 1996 with unchanged optics and one of the oldest L-lenses in the current lineup. It has the following specifications:
- Diameter: 83 mm
- Field of view: 18° (diagonally)
- Length: 112 mm
- Weight: 708g
- Filter Diameter: 72 mm
- Number of Aperture Blades: 8
- Elements/Groups: 10/8
- Close Focusing Distance: 0.9 m
- Maximum Magnification: 1:5
- Mount: Canon-EF
You may also have a look at Canon’s official page.
Handling / Build Quality
The lens is part of Canon’s L grade professional lenses so one would expect very good build quality and handling. Unlike the 70-200mm 4.0 L recently reviewed by me the outer casing seems to be mostly made of plastic, same goes for the filter thread. Nevertheless the lens feels very substantial and by no means cheap.
It takes about 120° to turn the very broad focusing ring from infinity to 0.9 m. The focusing ring is also not fly-by-wire and there is no slack when changing the direction of rotation (very) often seen on newer Nikon lenses.
Nothing moves externally and the focus ring is easily operated. In addition there is an AF <-> MF button and a focus limiter.
The lens hood is very big, very plasticy but is at least covered with velvet inside. A tripod collar is not available for this lens.
Personally I think the handling qualities of this lens are very good, but it is also about as big and as heavy as I want a lens for the A7 cameras to be (when using it handheld) and it is a better fit for the 2nd generation cameras in terms of balance.
I have only tested this lens with the Sigma MC-11 (300$, affiliate link). Which works quite good and snappy in decent lighting conditions as there is rarely any hunting even when going from infinity to the minimum focus distance.
In the dark things don’t look as great: there is much more hunting involved so I often switched to manual focus in the dark.
Wide open there is visible vignetting of roughly 1.7 EV, stopped down to f/5.6 it is negligible. There is also a Lightroom profile for correcting this.
Wide open the lens is fully usable right into the corners and only a tad less contrasty compared to f/2.8 to f/11 but I wouldn’t hesitate using this lens wide open at all. This is still an excellent performance, even more so considering the lens design dates back 20 years now.
The performance near the minimum focus distance is excellent as well, even wide open with the 42mp A7rII and looking at 100% crops. In the center I can hardly see any improvements on stopping down further.
This is definetly the weak spot of the lens. With the sun inside the frame there is a tremendous amount of ghosts, with the sun outside the frame veiling flare becomes a problem and the hood – despite being huge – doesn’t really help here.
Sony A7rII | Canon EF 135mm 2.0 L | f/5.6 | before no lens hood / after lens hood mounted
Wide open and stopped down to f/2.8 you can spot some slight coma in the corners. Stop down to f/4.0 and the problem goes away.
There is only an absolutely negligible amount of pincushion distortion with no field relevance.
The very smooth bokeh is one of the main selling points of this lens. There is also hardly any distracting outlining and no onion-ring like structure in the light discs. Only the cat’s eye effect – describing light discs becoming ovals towards the borders and corners – is quite pronounced.
Between f/2.0 and f/4.0 the sunstars are not so great, between f/5.6 and f/16 they are quite decent. Compared to the 70-200mm 4.0L the performance is a little bit better here. But this is more of a personal bias, so you may come to a different conclusion when looking at the samples.
Longitudinal CA (loCA) are definetly present and I would even consider them a weakness of the lens. Nevertheless I would describe the performance here as average, there are many fast lenses which perform much worse.
Sony A7rII | Canon EF 135mm 2.0 L | f/8.0 | CA 100% crop before/after extreme corner
The lateral CA correction is almost perfect. You can spot a tiny hint of CA at one of the edges, but this is absolutely negligible in real world use.
Samyang 135mm 2.0 ED UMC:
Check out Jannik’s review. Better loCA correction, otherwise they look pretty similar to me. Also cheaper, even more so when taking the necessary adapter for the Canon into consideration.
Zeiss APO Sonnar T* 135mm 2.0:
Rumored to be one of the lenses with the highest resolving power you can buy today. Better loCA correction, bigger, heavier, way more expensive.
Sony/Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm 1.8 SAL ZA:
Check out Phillip’s review as I haven’t used this lens yet. A tad faster, bigger, heavier and more expensive.
Even on today’s cameras the Canon EF 135mm 2.0L is still an excellent performer. Not only does it offer astonishing sharpness at all distances, it also manages to combine this with a wonderful bokeh and it has therfore already become one of my most favourite portrait lenses and easily so.
From a technical point of view the work against bright light is nothing to write home about. From my personal standpoint I sometimes like having a little flare in my portrait shots so this doesn’t bother me too much, but your mileage may vary here. The loCA correction could also be a little better, but as I am used to shoot portraits with the Nikon AF-S 85mm 1.4G things doesn’t look so bad here in comparison.
I also got word this lens does not work very well with the cheaper adapters, but I have only used it with the Sigma MC-11 personally and was mostly happy with it’s performance.
So, who is this lens for? Anyone, who looks for a very good, fast portrait tele with excellent sharpness and very smooth bokeh. A few years ago this lens was pretty much without competition. Today it might be worth taking a closer look at the Samyang 135mm 2.0, which also offers great performance at a cheaper price point, if you can live with it’s lack of autofocus.
My name is Bastian and for many years I have been mostly shooting Nikon DSLRs. As of today I have made my transition from Nikon to Sony and I am mainly using small but capable manual lenses.
My passion is landscape photography but I also like to delve into other subjects from time to time. You may follow me or take a look at my flickr-account http://www.flickr.com/bastian_k or visit my homepage http://www.fotoworkshop-bw.de (only available in German).
- Leica Summicron 90mm 2.0 pre Asph Review
- Voigtlander 10mm 5.6 Hyper Wide Heliar Review
- Canon nFD 135mm 2.8 Review
Latest posts by BastianK (see all)
- Review: MS-Optics Aporis 135mm 2.4 Fluorit MC - December 17, 2017
- The Man behind the Lens: Mr. Li (Laowa 15mm 2.0 Zero-D FE) - December 8, 2017
- Review: Laowa 15mm 2.0 Zero-D for Sony FE - December 2, 2017