Review: Voigtländer Ultron 28mm 2.0


Sony A7s mit Voigtländer Ultron 28mm 2.0
Sony A7s with Voigtländer Ultron 28mm 2.0 and VM-E close focus adapter (Helicoid)

The Voigtländer Ultron 28mm 2.0 is a quite small wide angle lens with Leica M mount. You may look up the specifications here on the official homepage. The lens is a quite modern design and has been introduced around 2012.

Sample Images

venice night sunstar ultron 28mm 2.0 sony a7
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/11 | full resolution
sunset sunrise sun sunstar ultron 28mm 2.0 contra light
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/11
abstract black and white b/w stairs ultron 28mm 2.0
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/4.0 | full resolution

It is one of my favorite lenses on the A7s. Phillip read my reports about it and asked me whether I would like to write an in-depth review about it.  Hopefully, at the end of this review, you will know why I like the Voigtländer 2/28 so much.

A German version of this review can be found on

You can get this lens on CameraQuest | | | B&H | | (affiliate links) for 400$ (used) to 599$ (new)

The A7 series and Leica-M wide angle lenses

mountain snow landscape Bieler Höhe Ultron 28mm 2.0
Sony A7 | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/8 | (panorama from 7 shots) | full resolution

Most of you have probably heard of problems when using rangefinder (which mostly means Leica M mount or Leica M39 thread mount) wide angle lenses on the Sony A7 series cameras. What some might not know: there are huge differences between the different A7 cameras, or, to be precise, between the different sensors in the A7 cameras.
But let’s first recap, which problems might occur:

  1. color cast on the edges and in the corners
  2. strong vignetting
  3. “corner smearing”

Color cast and vignetting are mainly influenced by the sensor design. The A7r is the worst, A7s(II) and A7rII fair much better. One also has to take into consideration that symmetrical wide angle lenses have quite  strong vignetting by design and, in this regard, are no comparison to the retro focus designs which are mainly used in SLR wide angle lenses.

The corner smearing on the other hand happens mainly due to the thick (in comparison to the Leica M cameras and especially film, where there is none) filter stack in front of the sensor. The glass is so thick that – in conjunction with the very steep light incidence – it affects the light rays hitting the sensor. In my experience the difference between all the A7 cameras is negligible here. There is one solution though, you may send your camera to Kolari Vision and they will replace the filter stack for you. I have not yet any experience with this replacement, because for people who do not live in the US the whole replacement procedure is a customs nightmare.
There is also a reason I don’t like the term “corner smearing” : what actually happens with many lenses (and I will show that in the performance section) is that the corners are just in a different plane of focus than the center portion of the frame and naturally this problem goes away when stopping down.

This whole topic is discussed in great detail in this article.


In general the bokeh is very smooth, especially for a wide angle lens. Getting close helps of course:

raven Bokeh Voigtlander 28mm 2.0
Sony A7 | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/2 | full resolution

But keep in mind: with 10 straight aperture-blades out-of-focus highlights become ten-sided figures instead of circles on stopping down:

mushroom Ultron 28mm 2.0@2.8
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/2.8


Close focus distance

Ultron 28mm 2.0 mushroom forest wide open wald Bokeh background unsharp
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/2 | full resolution

This lens has no floating elements (also often referred to as CRC = close range correction) design which shows, when pushing a bit too far in the macro range with the use of a helicoid adapter. The maximum magnification when using the Voigtländer VM-E close focus adapter is 1:5.5. Without such an adapter the minimum focus distance is 70 cm (27.6″) – common for lenses with rangefinder coupling – and therefore the maximum magnification is nothing to write home about here.


As already mentioned in the second section the lens exhibits significant field curvature due to the thick filter stack of the a7. Depending on the focusing-distance you set even the extreme corners near infinity look quite alright from f/2, but the center will be out of focus in this case.
ultron 28mm 2.0 sharpenss schärfe

When setting the focus for a sharp center at infinity you will notice awful corner sharpness but the center is excellent from f/2.
The good news here is: if you have a flat target and focus at the extreme corner the overall sharpness of the frame will suffice even at f5.6. At f11 you can just hit the infinity stop and “be there” in the center as well as the corners.

ultron 28mm 2.0 sharpenss schärfe
In case your asking yourself how this translates into real world images take a look at the following example:

Venice venezia 28mm 2.0 Ultron Bokeh
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/2 | full resolution

It was shot at f2.0 and focus is on the chair in the foreground. So what you now may notice: the center part of the frame is quite out of focus whilst the edges, not so much. If this is for you highly depends on your preferences.

Flare resistance

venice ultron 28mm 2.0 contra light voitglander
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/11 | full resolution

Under certain circumstances you may catch some ghosting  and you might see a small loss of contrast but very often I could just shoot directly into the sun without any problems. As with many lenses it really depends on the angle between the lens and the sun.


Karlsbrücke Charles Bridge Prag Praha Ultron 28mm 2.0 Sunstars Blendensterne
Sony A7s | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/11 | full resolution

Definitely one of the strengths of the Voigtländer, as it produces wonderfully defined 10-pointed sunstars.

Karlsbrücke Charles Bridge Prag Praha Ultron 28mm 2.0 Sunstars Blendensterne
100% crop from previous photo

Chromatic aberrations

wide angle bokeh ultron 28mm 2.0 ca
Sony A7 | Voigtländer Ultron 2.0/28 | f/2.0 |

Neither transversal nor longitudinal chromatic aberrations are worth talking about with this lens. This is really good news, especially for the background bokeh. Other lenses often suffer from green highlights around the points of light in case of bad LoCA correction, the Sony FE 2/28 is an example for that.

Sample Images

I have set up a flickr album which contains many shots taken with the 28mm 2.0 Ultron and I will add more pictures to that in the future.


The Ultron faces fierce competition by Sony’s own 28mm 2.0 FE lens. The Sony lens was of course constructed with the A7 sensors with their thick filter stack in mind so you won’t notice field curvature introduced by that (although you may also catch a color cast with this lens).

On the other hand the Sony FE 2/28 has tremendous distortion (which of course can be corrected) and the focus ring is not directly coupled with the mechanics as it is a fly-by-wire design which also means there is no physical distance scale. The Sony lens also offers autofocus and on top of that can be used with the wideangle- and fisheye converters.

The Sony 2/28 will set you back around 450$ whilst the Voigtländer Ultron 2/28 costs roughly 400-600$ on (affiliate link). You may add the cost of an adapter here, too. Because of that price difference some may ask if there is any reason to buy the Voigtlander lens, but frankly – apart from the parameters – these are very different instruments.

The Sony takes a more modern approach. It has AF, no “real” focus ring, no distance scale and it heavily relies on digital corrections.
The Voigtlander is more of a classic lens. It is made from metal (therefore a real joy to use), incorporates a hard infinity stop, no electronics at all and is adaptable to various kinds of cameras.


As always: Whether this lens is for you or not depends a lot on your personal preferences.

If you expect even sharpness across the whole frame from f/2 you are likely to be disappointed. To be fair this is not the fault of the Voigtländer 2/28 which was designed for a thinner sensor stack.

In general I either use the lens at f/2 for subject isolation where the the lower resolution in the corners doesn’t bother me too much but the very good sharpness in the center and the pleasant bokeh make it very suitable for that purpose

Or I use it at f8 or f11 for landscape and architectural work. Stopped down the lenses’ across-the-frame sharpness is very good. What really stands out are the beautiful sunstars on stopping down, which in my opinion have way more influence on the photograph than a little more resolution in the corners. Distortion is well controlled and the vignetting in line with what you would expect from a lens with these parameters. There is also a Lightroom profile for correcting both.

I can recommend this lens to anyone who wants his cityscape pictures to really stand out and who likes to use a beautifully crafted lens with a very classic approach to photography despite the lack of all the bells and whistles (AF, image stabilizer, OLED display) the competition offers.   

You can get this lens on CameraQuest | | | B&H | | (affiliate links) for 400$ (used) to 599$ (new)

The following two tabs change content below.
My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f/0.95 to a 200mm f/1.8) and I also have reviewed way too many 35mm lenses. Don't ask me anything about macro or wildlife shooting though.

Latest posts by BastianK (see all)

39 thoughts on “Review: Voigtländer Ultron 28mm 2.0”

  1. Hi Bastian,
    thx for reviewing the lens. My favorite manual lenses are the Voigtländer (Pancake) SL lenses for Nikon. I also had the 28mm SL II F2.8, but it stayed at home, since 28mm is not my focal length, good to see that 28mm can produce nice pictures (these days I enjoy 40-60mm) .
    Also I enjoyed the testshots showing Stuttgart instead of Bielefeld (-: !
    Drink & Click On !

  2. Nice review. This lens seems to have much in common with the Carl Zeiss 28mm F/2 Distagon, which I use on my Sony A7 with the Nikon F to Sony E mount adapter. Both have a pronounced field curvature (that’s a good thing for my use, not so good for others), both are made of metal and have good flare resistance. Voigtlander seems smaller, lighter and cheaper and of course useable on Leicas. The Zeiss to me produces unique and attractive rendering to images on the Sony A7, with excellent 3D microcontrast and sharpness, especially close up with its floating elements design. Either way, both lenses look to be absolute winners!

    1. Hi SpaceMan,

      i have recently aquired the Contax 28mm f/2 “Hollywood” (AEG). This lens is closely relative to your Distagon 28mm f/2 ZF, its ancestor.

      To be honest, i don’t think that the Distagon and the Ultron have much in common. I see a very strong midzone-dip here in the Ultron aperture series (even at f/5.6) that the Distagon only has until f/2.8. At f/5.6, it is very sharp all over the frame, even with the more demanding A7R. Field curvature for the Distagon is surprisingly low, actually it is possible to get a corner-to-corner landscape shot at f/2 although there is a lot of astigmatism in the corners wide open.

      If size, weight and cost don’t bother you, the Distagon could be the better choice.

      The Ultron could be attractive if you like the special character of the lens, that Basti worked out very good here.

      I think, that I am going to review the Distagon 2/28 later this year.

    1. Dear Jorge, I will first review the Leica M lenses I personally own, because unfortunately even the “cheap” ones are too expensive to just buy them for the purpose of writing a review 🙂

  3. Thanks a lot for this review. Just received a Rokkor 28mm f/2 (113€ on ebay) and am waiting for the Zhongyi ii focal reducer for my A 6000 (would alledgedly give a 30mm f1.4 eq FF).
    First shots show nice bokey at f2.0 (but it clearly depends on subject).
    I saw you reviewed it. How does it compare to the Sony and the Voigtlander?

  4. The 28 f2 CVC is one of my favorites as well primarily for its contrast and color. The focus issue is really nonexistent on APSC.

  5. Hi,
    I just dropped my voigtlander vm 28mm f2 ultron and damaged the lens hood. I can’t seem to find a replacement for this lens. Do any of you know of any compatible hood with the lens, attachable to the female thread it has and not to the inner 46mm filter thread ?

  6. Hey,
    whats your suggestion for a good adapter lm-nex for the ultrons 28 and 35 regarding
    1 infinity stop?
    2 possible frontfilter fix?
    your input is very much appreciated.
    (with my minolta lenses i always used a novoflex adapter. might that be to precise for having enough space for point 1 and 2?)

    1. I just bought this one and it works with the CV35 and a 5m lens:

      I don’t know of any tests with the 28, if it requires a stronger correction lens it might not reach infinity with the K&F. There is also no guarantee that another K&F adapter will be just as thin as mine and there seems to be some variation of the flange focal distance of Sony E-mount cameras.

  7. Hello,

    I’m A7 user, and i’m thinking to buy one of this lenses:
    Voigtlander 28 F2 or the FE 28mm F2, or Nikkor 35mm F2 or per finish the Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f2.4.

    Can you say me what is your preference in this case?


    Best regards.

    1. These are all very different lenses.
      I have never used the Zeiss Flektogon 35mm 2.4.
      The Nikkor 35mm 2.0 has what I would call mediocre to bad bokeh and is quite big with adapter.
      When it comes to VM 28mm 2.0 and FE 28mm 2.0 the question is:
      Do you need/want AF, what sunstar rendering do you prefer, would you rather have the solid housing of the VM or the lightweight of the FE?
      I can’t answer these questions for you.

      1. Thank’s bastian.

        Good to know that Nikko 35 is not good.
        So, now i’m looking two Voigtlander, the 28 F2 and the 35 F1.7 more the Sony 28 F2.

        About the weight or the AF i do not have preferences, what I want is a lens between 28 and 35 with a beautiful bokeh and with good image quality.

  8. First, sorry for my bad English. I’m a “newbie” in photography but I was really interested in your review on this beautiful lens. But I don’t really understand the field curvature part, can you make a more detailed explanation about this problematic issue ? As far as I understand, field curvature is the DOF being curved so when I want my camera focus on the center of a plane which is perpendicular to camera’s direction, the corner of the plane will be out of focus or otherwise, is it right ?

  9. Hi Bastian, what about the incredible manual Nikon 28/2.8 AIS with 8 elements, one of the most perfect lenses at the time..did you try this one, too?

  10. Bastian and Philip,

    How does the 28mm Ultron compare to the 35mm Ultron in terms of bokeh, IQ at portrait distances, and vignetting? I read your review of the 35mm Ultron and 35mm “shoot out” as well. I would use either one on a Sony A7r3.
    I don’t mind the difference in focal length, but am more concerned about the aforementioned issues.


      1. Thanks Bastian for the advice! I always enjoy the articles here. The 28mm is a couple hundred dollars less than the 35mm Ultron, so their similar image quality is positive for me as a user.

        I am very new to photography, I have the Sony 55 and 85 plus the Tamron 28-75, of the Ultrons would you recommend the 28mm or 35mm for indoor family candids (in home and hotels) and some vacation environ portraits?

        Thanks again!

  11. Bastian

    Once again, thanks for the response and the great advice! Awesome photos too, love the shot of the lady facing the alpine lake. I’m on the hunt for a 35mm Ultron now.

  12. Hi Bastian, the new version of Ultron 28 seems really promising. Do you have plans of reviewing it as well?

    1. Due to Brexit it is harder for us to get Voigtländer review samples at the moment.
      If someone offers me one I will review it, but it may take a while.

  13. There is now an Ultron II aspherical. It is tiny and optically excellent. For me it is better than all the 28mm lenses you test here. Maybe you should have a look.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.