Analogue Adventures – Part 16: Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2 processed

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Kodak Gold 200

Kodak Gold 200 again? Hasn’t there been an article covering this film already? Yes, but the Silbersalz35 guys started offering a new lab service in 2022 for developing some of the popular C-41 still photography films with the more complex ECN-2 process. But is it a good idea? I wanted to find out, I received the scans, so let’s have a look together.
Processing (ECN-2) and scanning was done at Silbersalz35 in Germany.
Update May 2023: more pictures added

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/8.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/2.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 35mm 1.4 | f/11 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
hologon leica m contax-g 16mm 8.0 8/16 center filter review sharpness leica m10 m11 sony e-mount adapter conversion sharpness distortion carl zeiss germany
Leica M6 | Hologon 16mm 8.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
review minolta ltm m39 leica 40mm 1.7 hi-matic e miyazaki sadayasu modified lens contrast resolution m10 42mp 24mp 61mp m6 analogue contrast bokeh vignetting
Minolta CLE | Minolta/MS 40mm 1.7 | f/8.0 | Gold 200 ECN-2
Voigtländer Cosina 40mm 1.4 1.4/40 mc multi coated sc single comparison review leica m10 m11 m10r sony a7rv a7riv 61mp 42mp 24mp sharpness resolution handling build quality
Minolta CLE | Voigtländer VM 40mm 1.4 MC | f/8.0 | Gold 200 ECN-2

I only tried like 5 or 6 labs so far (January 2023) but the Silbersalz scans are easily my favorite. The scans include a bit of the frame so you do have to crop every picture but you can also be sure that nothing gets lost, an issue I recently had with another lab.

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/11 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2 | unaltered scan

Compared to what I have written here there have been some changes since they acquired that 14k Apollon scanner. Now you only get simple 4k (4000×2500 px) Jpegs instead of the 6k Jpegs and clunky (and imho a bit useless) Jpeg2000 files, you can however also order higher resolution 14k (14200×8900 px) scans in Jpeg/Jpeg2000 format for – at the time of writing this – 10€ for four films.
The difference between 10mp and 140mp sounds so big compared to the difference between 40€ and 50€ you might be tempted to get the higher resolution scans. After having received a “free upgrade” for one of my previous films and gotten the chance to compare side by side, for me personally I don’t think having to deal with 140mp files is worth the minimal amount of additional detail. Your mileage may vary here of course.
As I keep always saying: having more pixels doesn’t equal more details.

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 35mm 1.4 | f/2.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2

But how about the Kodal Gold 200 when processed in ECN-2? I cannot compare this ECN-2 processing to the C-41 processing in a semi-scientific way, as it would mean taking the same pictures of the same thing with the same lens at the same time and having both films developed by different labs (which also includes a plethora of additional factors) so you have to live with my subjective impression here.

In terms of colors these scans look better to me than what I got from my other Gold 200 films before. That being said a bit of the Gold 200 signature might be lost in the process, so if you always liked your Gold 200 pictures the way they were you may want to stick to that.

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/2.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/2.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2

What is very apparent to me with the films I sent to the Silbersalz lab so far though: the applied color science for their Jpegs gives really likable results even under challenging lighting conditions. Just compare the pictures under artificial light in this article to the previous ones.

Keeping in mind that they charge less than many other labs I am very likely to drop off my “supported” films there in the future as well. Just the turnaround time of 2 weeks is too long…

kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/11 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/5.6 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/11 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 24mm 2.0 | f/2.8 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 35mm 1.4 | f/2.0 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
kodak gold 200 analogue leica m6 contax canon fd olympus om
Leica M6 | MS-Optics 35mm 1.4 | f/2.8 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
Minolta CLE | Voigtländer VM 40mm 1.4 | f/2.8 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
Minolta CLE | Voigtländer VM 40mm 1.4 | f/1.4 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2
Minolta CLE | Voigtländer VM 40mm 1.4 | f/2.8 | Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2

Further Reading

Support Us

Did you find this article useful or just liked reading it? Treat us to a coffee or a roll of film!
via Paypal

The following two tabs change content below.
My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f/0.95 to a 200mm f/1.8) and I also have reviewed way too many 35mm lenses. Don't ask me anything about macro or wildlife shooting though.

13 thoughts on “Analogue Adventures – Part 16: Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2 processed”

  1. I agree with your synopsis; the finished product looks like a more toned down version of Gold, which I definitely prefer. In fact, some of my favourite colours I have seen recently from film scans. However, if you love that ‘Gold’ look specifically, you might like these less than the other development process

  2. Thanks for this, great pictures and analysis as always! Did you expose at box speed? How would you compare this – price aside – to the original Silbersalz 250D? Which do you prefer from your experience? Thanks, Alex

    1. I shot it at box speed, but it wouldn’t hurt to overexpose by 0.5 to 1.0 EV.
      The 250D is my least favorite of the Silbersalz35 films, so I might actually prefer the ECN-2 processed Gold 200 here.

  3. The process sounds interesting and since I actually don’t really like the yellow characteristic of Gold 200 I might try them some time 🙂

    Is there a lab comparison article coming? ^^

  4. how are you enjoying your film adventure so far? would you say it was worth selling all your pokemon cards? or does it just make you appreciate digital that much more?

    1. Definitely worth selling those cards, waited more than 20 years for that!
      These days, I think many of the films available are rather junk and it really isn’t always easy to get the nicer ones.
      The look of the film pictures is very different actually. More grain, less contrast, less perfect.
      I didn’t come to a final conclusion yet 🙂

  5. Very nice photos and interesting results you found.
    So the strong red and blue ish colors is because of ECN-2, or because of Silbersalz35 scans? I remember their scans have a strong color cast. Really like those colors though.
    And what about dynamic range, normally ECN-2 should give better dynamic range than C41 (i.e. look at results from Kodak Vision3 vs Cinestill), is dynamic range better aka. lower contrast?

    1. I cannot answer your first question as I would need to at least have the negatives rescanned by someone else or better shoot the same pictures with two different rolls of film and have one developed in C-41 and one in ECN-2.
      I see a weaker color cast in the Silbersalz scans than any other scans I came across so far.
      Dynamic range is better with the ECN-2 process and pretty much everything has better dynamic range than that dreadful Cinestill 800T, but if maximizing dynamic range was my ultimate goal I wouldn’t be shooting analogue to begin with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *