The Voigtlander Heliar 75mm F1.8 is a rare representative of the family of 75mm lenses. In this shorter review I give you my impressions on how it performs on the Sony a7ii.
Specifications
| Diameter | 58 mm |
| Length | 74 mm |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm |
| Weight | 427 g |
| Max. Magnification | 0.12 |
| Close Focusing Distance from the sensor | 0.9 m |
| Number of aperture blades | 10 |
| Elements/ Groups | 6/3 |
In Germany you can buy it used for around 400€ at ebay.de (affiliate link).
Image Samples
Just click on any image to get to the full resolution version.
What I like about it
The Handling
The Voigtländer 1.8/75 is very well built, rather small and it has a smooth focusing ring with a good transmission. So handling is very pleasant.
The sunstars
Thanks to 10 straight aperture blades you can get very well defined sunstars from f/5.6.
Flare resistance is generally good but you can get veiling flare as well as minor ghosting in critical situations. I didn’t use a hood though which might improve performance in this regard.
What I didn’t like
The Sharpness
The 1.8/75 is part of the Voigtlander’s classic line and it is indeed closer to classic portrait lenses which are usually a bit soft wide open though the Voigtlander has good contrast from f/1.8. At f/2.8 it is sharp in the center but it takes until f/4 until the center reaches an excellent level. For very good corners you should stop down to f/8.
I wasn’t too happy with the sharpness: I used it wide open most of the time and found the results a bit lacking. It is sharp enough for web sized images but doesn’t hold up well for bigger enlargements.
Click here to check my sharpness test.
Chromatic aberrations
I had quite a few images which suffered from axial CA. The issue is very obvious especially wide open. Almost every other 85mm lens suffers from thi issue but I found it very obvious in the Heliar.
The Bokeh
The bokeh can be very smooth as in this image with an undemanding background:
But in more challenging situations bokeh is a bit more nervous than I like:
Alternatives
- Olympus OM 100mm 1:2.8: Not quite the same focal length and speed but apart from the sunstars I like it better in any aspect and it costs a fourth of the Heliar.
- Tokina 2.5/90 Macro: One of my all time favorite manual lenses. It is larger but it is sharper, has less CA, better bokeh and it focuses down to 1:2. The coatings of the Voigtländer are significantly more effective though.
- Voigtländer Heliar 2.5/75: It’s smaller brother is significantly smaller and lighter and as far as I can judge also a better performer.
Conclusion
I wouldn’t recommend the Voigtländer Heliar 75mm 1:1.8 to photographers who look for a lens with similar performance to Voigtlander’s modern lenses like the great 1.7/35 or 5.6/10. It isn’t sharp enough at wider apertures for that and shows too many aberrations. It might be a decent option if you like a more classic look, after all there are very few alternatives when you look for a 75mm lens and it is very well made and not that expensive.
The Voigtländer 1.8/75 usually sells for around $430 used at ebay.com (affiliate link).
In Germany you can buy it used for around 400€ at ebay.de (affiliate link).
If this review was helpful to you, please consider using one of my affiliate links. Thanks 🙂
Images Samples in full resolution
You can find more images in this flickr set: Voigtlander Heliar 75mm F1.8
Other articles
- The Guide to Canon FD lenses in the digital age
- Affordable manual lenses for the Sony Alpha 7
- User-Guide to wide-angle lenses for Sony a7
Latest posts by Phillip Reeve (see all)
- Rolling Review: Voigtlander 65 mm F2 Macro APO-Lanthar - August 18, 2017
- Tokina Firin 20mm F2 FE Review: A good deal? - July 30, 2017
- Review: Zeiss Loxia Planar 2/50 T* - July 9, 2017
Your experience matches mine when I borrowed this lens after getting my original A7r.
But I then got the much smaller colour Heliar 2.4/75 and that’s a completely different beast. OK (but quite a bit of axial CA wide open) but much better half a stop down and wicked sharp from f4, if not quite the contrast of some lenses. And so small!
I don’t use it as much as I should, too many other options, but it is really tiny and really sharp, and a great option for someone who does a lot of hiking or wilderness work (I tend not to use it only because I use the much pricier ZM85 for this, but I’d strongly reccoend the 2.4/75 to soeone who wanted to spend less for a short tele hiking lens that’s even lighter)
Thank you for the review. It is difficult to find nice reviews for this particular lens online. I was considering this as a rangefinder sized portrait lens for my A7 but ended up going with a Jupiter 9 and a M90 summicron.
I think you made the better choice 😉
Interesting review. Oddly, perhaps, my copy seems plenty sharp wide open.
Can you share some full resolution images? 🙂
You looking for Raws, or HiRes jpgs? I use flickr, and am not sure how to share Raws, in any case.
Here’s a flickr album link, if that helps. https://flic.kr/s/aHskTxkbCk
Anything full resolution? These are all 2048x, which doesn’t do much for determining sharpness. Full res JPEGs are nice, as long as you know the general settings (Standard style, +/- X on sharpness, etc). You can share RAWs with Dropbox, Google Drive or any other file sharing service.