Specifications

Diameter: 75mm
Length: 89mm
Filter Thread: 55mm
Weight: 600g
Max. Magnification :  1:2
Close Focusing Distance (from the sensor/from the front of the lens): 45cm /27cm
Number of aperture blades: 6
Elements/ Groups: 5/4
Price:  (February 2015): 90-150€ in good condition at ebay.de or $110-170 at ebay.com (advertisement, affiliate links)

Versions

Minolta made three versions of the lens which share the optical design

1. The Minolta MC MACRO ROKKOR-QE 100mm 1:3.5 was introduced in 1972 and has a metal focusing ring with 550g it is a bit lighter than later versions.
2. The Minolta MC MACRO ROKKOR (QE) 100mm 1:3.5 was introduced in 1973 and it has a rubberized focusing ring.
3. The Minolta Minolta MD MACRO ROKKOR 100mm 1:3.5 is the version shown in my pictures.

The differences between the different versions are minor and only cosmetically. Only if you plan to use the lens on a younger Minolta film camera the MD version has  some advantages.

For more technical details visit the Minolta SR lens index.

Build quality and handling

Builts quality is excellent, everything is made from high quality metals and feels very solid.

The focusing ring travels around 220° from 45cm to 1m and a further 60° to infinity. The focusing has just the right amount of resistance and is a joy to use. It is a bit hard to focus the lens at longer distances because the focus throw is quite short at distances above 1.5m.

The aperture ring has full stops from f/5.6 to f/16 and no stop from f/3.5 to f/5.6 and f/16 to f/22.

The lens is quite large for a little camera like the Sony Alpha 7 and I prefer to use a L-bracket with it but it is quite possible to use it without. The weight is centered in the middle of the lens which is good for balance.

The front lens is well protected even without the massive made from metal lens hood but because the lens is very sensitive to flare to lens hood is recommended.

 Image Samples in low resolution

You can find some more samples in this flickr set.

Optical performance

These results are based on the use with a Sony Alpha 7.

Flare Resistance

The lens is very very sensitive to flare and this can be quite limiting at times

Bokeh

Bokeh is one of the biggest strengths of the lens.

Chromatic Aberrations

Lateral chromatic aberrations are almost non existent.

Axial chromatic aberrations (“bokeh fringing”) are about average.

Sharpness

f/3.5 and f/5.6: Sharp in the center but midframe and corner sharpness isn’t that good.

f/8:Now the image is sharp to very sharp across the frame. A solid but not great performance.

f/11: The corners improve further

Now lets have a look at the closeup performance, I compared it to my Tokina 2.5/90 which is an excellent lens.

First the center with my Nex-5n:I see an advantage for the Tokina but the difference isn’t huge.

Now I placed the same subject in the corners (back to a7):ouch! I redid the test two times because I assumed that I had make a mistake but with no  better results. Based on the infinity results f/8 would probably give better results for the Minolta but you will notice diffraction.

Conclusion

This is a nice lens, the mechanical quality is great and optically it is a capable lens, the only issues I found is the bad flare resistance and below average corner performance (which isn’t that much of a problem in the field). I enjoyed using it.

What I did not enjoy was carrying it: This is a pretty big and heavy lens and I found myself often wondering  if it was worth to put it in my bag when there are other lenses which do the same or even more while being lighter.

My Tokina 2.5/90 Macro is much a more versatile lens: It is a lot smaller and a little lighter while being faster (important for portraits), not that sensitive to flare, sharper and easier to focus at longer distances.

So if you already own one or can get one cheaply I am pretty positive that you will enjoy it. But don’t spend too much on it.

Here are the ebay links: ebay.de | ebay.com (advertisement, affiliate links)

Also check out my Minolta SR-mount adapter guide.

Alternatives

•  Minolta MC  2.5/100: Not a macro lens but a better portrait and landscape lens. For my everyday photography I would prefer it.
• Tokina 2.5/90 Macro: i think this lens does everything the Minolta does a little better, the only downside is the noticeably higher price
• Almost any manufacturer had a 4/100 Macro lens and these are usually a lot smaller and lighter than this lens. The Minolta MD 4/100 is a bit sharper but I didn’t like the focusing ring.

Images Samples in full resolution

Further Reading

For more Minolta lenses check out my Minolta list.

To learn about manual lenses in general this beginners guide might be helpful.

Support Us

Did you find this article useful or just liked reading it? Treat us to a coffee!
via Paypal

This site contains advertisement/affiliate links. If you make a purchase using any of the links marked as advertisement/affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the creation of future content.