The 7Artisans 28mm 1.4 FE+ is a surprisingly well rounded prime for a very reasonable price. Now 7Artisans released an even faster 75mm f/1.25 lens. But is it as good as the 28mm lens? Read on to find out.
Most of the sample images in this review can be found in full resolution here.
- Sample Images
- Specifications / Version History
- Handling / Build Quality
- Flare resistance
- Chromatic aberration
- Focus shift
- Sample Images
- Further Reading
Specifications / Version History
Apart from the $12.795 Leica 75mm f/1.25 Noctilux this is the only other 75mm f/1.25 lens. It comes with M-mount and has the following specifications:
- Diameter: 70 mm
- Field of view: 32.2° (diagonally)
- Length: 73 mm (+adapter)
- Weight: 603g (+adapter, without caps)
- Filter Diameter: 62 mm
- Number of Aperture Blades: 12 (rounded at wider apertures)
- Elements/Groups: 7/6
- Close Focusing Distance: 0.8 m
- Maximum Magnification: 1:9.6 (measured)
- Mount: Leica-M
You can get this lens on amazon.com/amazon.de, B&H or ebay.com/ebay.de for about $449/499€ (affiliate links)
The 7Artisans 75mm 1.25 was kindly provided free of charge by 7Artisans for reviewing purpose for a duration of 4 weeks.
Handling / Build Quality
The 7Artisans 75mm f/1.25 looks and feels very similar to the 7Artisans 28mm f/1.4 FE+ and therefore also to most current Leica M lenses.
Markings are yellow/white (seem to be slightly engraved and filled with paint) focus ring has a very nice resistance and turns slightly more than 90° from the minimum focus distance of 0.8 m to infinity.
Compared to the 28mm f/1.4 the focus ring is not as smooth though, you can sometimes hear a slight scratchy noise. Some early adopters claim this goes away after some usage.
The aperture ring has full stop click stops which I think is a good design decision. It makes changing the aperture to the desired value without looking at the lens very easy.
The 28’s aperture ring was slightly wobbly, this is not the case here, but I found something rather unusual:
In both directions you can move the aperture ring a bit past the marks, so slightly beyond f/1.25 (makes no difference, I also saw this on the Leica-M 35mm 1.4 FLE by the way) and a bit past the f/16 marking, where you can actually stop down the lens a bit further.
The lens comes with a slip on metal front cap, but there is unfortunately no official lens hood available. Some generic 62mm screw in hood may work, but I did not try any.
Wide open there is strong light falloff of roughly 2.9 EV, but the pattern is somewhat unusual with a rather harsh drop off close to the corners. So compared to some other lenses it is in fact a bit better than these numbers suggest.
As in most categories we only see a minor difference on stopping down to f/1.4 which is within the margin of error.
Stopped down to f/2.0 light falloff in the corners improves to 2.0 EV, stopped down to f/2.8 it is 1.3 EV and further improves to 0.3 EV at f/8.0.
These values are higher than those of the Voigtlander VM 75mm 1.5 at wider apertures. You can correct this in Lightroom, but there is no profile available yet.
It is recommended to have a look at this article first to get an idea how this brightness graph works.
Very fast yet compact lenses usually show a significant amount of optical vignetting. Without going too much into technical details optical vignetting leads to the truncation of light circles towards the borders of the frame.
In the center of the frame almost every lens will render a perfect circle, but only lenses with very low optical vignetting will keep this shape in the corners.
So in the following comparison we move from the center (left) to the extreme corner (right) and see how the shape of the light circle changes.
Considering the small size of the lens the performance is better than I would have expected.
These shots were taken at 1.1 m focus distance, you may get slightly different results at other distances.
In the center the resolution at infinity is okay at f/1.25, but we can see quite a bit of glow (spherical aberration) and also purple fringing. There is surprisingly little fall off in the midframe and corners.
Stopping down to f/1.4 reduces the purple fringing a bit but doesn’t do much about resolution and contrast.
Stopping down to f/2.0 the performance increases noticeably and f/2.8 looks pretty good across the whole frame.
So the lens can be used for stopped down shooting and give satisfactory results, but it won’t show the high contrast and edge acuity, contrast and reveal fine details as well as the Zeiss Loxia 85mm 2.4 or Sony FE 85mm 1.4 GM slightly stopped down.
Still – compared to other small yet very fast lenses – the 7Artisans 75mm f/1.25 fared much better than I would have expected and I doubt we will see an FE+ version as there is simply no need for one. Field curvature and fall off towards the corners are both well controlled.
There is a bit of focus shift (see corresponding section) which I did not adjust for here. This is why at f/4.0 and f/5.6 the midframe looks better than the center.
portrait distance (2.25 m)
For portraiture it isn’t so important how flat the field is, it is more interesting to see what the sharpness is like when focused at different parts of the frame to take field curvature out of the equasion.
This is what I did here, I refocused for every shot to get the best possible result at different locations in the frame (center, inner midframe and outer midframe).
Focus distance was roughly 2.25 m and the circle of the dollar bill is more or less the size of a human eye.
100% crops, A7rII
For head shot portraits I found the lens to be somewhat hard to focus at f/1.25 and here it becomes apparent why that is the case: at maximum aperture there is a significant amount of spherical aberration.
The situation improves greatly on stopping down to f/2.0, so for shots at these distances that would be my preferred aperture with this lens.
close (0.80 m, 1:9.6)
100% crops from center, A7rII, because of focus shift (see corresponding section) I refocused for every shot.
Similar to many other (especially fast) lenses without a floating elements design the performance wide open at the minimum focus distance ain’t that great (unless you are after a really dreamy look).
But stopping down to f/2.0 improves the performance significantly, stopping down to f/2.8 and f/4.0 even more.
Shooting directly into a point light source at wider apertures will give you all kinds of artifacts. On closer inspection I noticed there is also some kind of a ring flare around a point light source close to the center in this lens:
At f/1.25 and f/1.4 this veiling flare will be visible across the whole frame and on stopping down the “unaffected center” grows bigger. On stopping down to ~f/4.0 this goes away.
It is also unfortunate there is no hood for this lens available. With a strong light source just outside the frame you can also catch noticeable veiling flare. Shading the lens with my hand gave much bettere results, so a hood would have surely helped here.
Some of you may like these effects for portraiture, but it really isn’t a good performance in this category.
Wide open coma is pretty strong. Stopping down to f/2.8 improves the performance significantly, but it takes stopping down to f/4.0 for good performance.
This is not a lens I would recommend for astrophotography at wider apertures and for city scapes at night it is best to stop down to f/4.0 or further.
100% crops from extreme corner, focused on corner, A7rII
There is a very slight amount of barrel distortion which will hardly be field relevant. For such architecture shots you can correct it by dialing in +2 in Lightroom/Camera raw.
If you consider getting a 75mm 1.25 lens this is probably the most interesting topic to talk about. The short version: it is good.
But let us have a look at how it works at different distances.
When you are close to your subject the bokeh is very smooth, which is the case for most lenses:
When focusing on something a bit further away it looks good with low outlining:
At longer distances it still looks pleasing to my eyes, but on closer inspection you will notice the highlights now show some more structure, sometimes even an inner cirlce (we also saw that with the 28mm 1.4 FE+):
I think the lens delivers in this category, but as this is a personal matter best have a look at the sample images to decide for yourself if you like what you are seeing.
Unlike the 7Artisans 28mm 1.4 FE+ this 75mm 1.25 features 12 aperture blades, like some of the newer Voigtlander lenses.
And actually this might be the best designed diapraghm I have ever seen: it stays rounded from f/1.4 to f/2.8 and after that is straight. So you get nice round bokeh highlights slightly stopped down and at the same time beautiful sunstars stopped down further.
Can I have this diaphragm in all of my lenses please?
90% crops from center, A7rII
100% crops from extreme corner, A7rII
There are only minor lateral CA visible that are easily corrected either in camera (for Jpegs) or in a raw developer like Lightroom by one click.
50% crops, A7rII
In close up scenarios you can see a noticeable amount of green and magenta outlining. Naturally this goes away on stopping down, but even at f/4.0 there are still traces left.
In very demanding scenes like the one below you can spot loCA even in smaller prints, but this is still in line with what is to be expected from a very fast yet compact lens like this.
50% crops, A7rII
When stopping down the plane of optimal focus noticeably shifts to the back, so you have to focus a bit closer for best performance. I recommend focusing at working aperture at all distances with this lens to get best results.
Voigtlander VM 75mm 1.5 Nokton:
This lens hit the market at pretty much the same time. It is lighter, sharper and contrastier. The bokeh might not be as smooth at times (hard to say without direct comparison), but it is nevertheless very nice.
If you don’t mind the 2 to 2.5 times higher price tag this lens is surely worth a look.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de for $999 (affiliate links)
MS Optics 73mm 1.5 Sonnetar:
A rather rare and unusual lens. It has a very dreamy look at maximum aperture. If you are after that or you are looking for something “unique” this might be for you.
Also only weighs 1/3rd of the 7Artisans 75mm 1.25.
buy from JCH | ebay.com (affiliate link) for $1100
Voigtlander VM 75mm 1.8 Heliar:
Phillip and I have used it in the past and neither of us really liked it. Better get the VM 75mm 1.5 or the 7Artisans 75mm 1.25.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de for $699 (affiliate links)
Leica-M 75mm lenes:
There are several Leica-M 75mm lenses with maximum aperture of f/1.25, f/1.4, f/2.0, f/2.4 and f/2.5 available. These lenses cost 3 to 30 times as much and I have no personal experience with them.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de (affiliate links)
Fast legacy 85mm lenses:
Canon used to make 85mm f/1.2 lenses for FD mount. I am not sure these are optically better and they are more expensive used than this 7Artisans 75mm 1.25 is new.
There are no 75mm AF lenses available so instead we will have a look at some 85mm lenses here.
Sony FE 85mm 1.4 GM:
This is still the gold standard for me when it comes to portrait lenses. Enough said.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de for $1799 (affiliate links)
Viltrox 85mm 1.8 FE (review coming soon):
Your cheapest native AF option in the FE system. It looks like a nicely balanced lens despite a few flaws. Best wait for the review to get an in depth opinion on this one.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de for $379 new (affiliate links)
Sony FE 85mm 1.8:
This seems to be the fastest focusing 85mm lens for the FE system these days. So if this is important to you it might be the best lens for you.
buy from amazon.com | amazon.de | B&H | ebay.com | ebay.de for $548 new (affiliate links)
This is one of these lenses where the whole of the lens is probably greater than the sum of its parts, which makes an evaluation not an easy task.
What does this mean? In many categories the performance is not as good as one would hope for, especially the resolution at f/1.25 at focus distances < 3.0 m. I found it really hard to properly focus the lens here at maximum aperture.
Furthermore we have quite noticeable focus shift (as this lens is supposed to be a “Sonnar” design this does not come as a surprise though) which will especially hurt the rangefinder users.
Longitudinal CA – while not excessive – are also on the high side and neither coma correction nor flare resistance at wider apertures are nothing to write home about.
It also is not a lens for beginners, I think for those it might be better to get one of the cheaper 85mm AF options. Especially with eye AF it is easier to get satisfactory results with these AF lenses.
Yet at the same time I like the pictures I took with this lens quite a lot: the bokeh is undistracting and smooth and the contrast at f/1.25 is good enough to give nice subject separation.
Compared to other lenses as fast it is also compact and comes at a very reasonable price.
A special mentioning deserves the aperture diapraghm: this is the best I have seen in any lens yet. It features 12 blades (like we also see in some newer Voigtlander lenses) but they are rounded from f/1.4 to f/2.8 and straight afterwards. This allows for smooth, round highlights slightly stopped down (where the Voigtlander lenses fail) and beautiful sunstars stopped down further (where pretty much all the lenses with 7, 9 or 11 blades, so almost all current Nikon, Sony, Canon and Sigma lenses, fail).
I would really love if other manufacturers would adopt this kind of diaphragm design.
You can get this lens on amazon.com/amazon.de, B&H or ebay.com/ebay.de for about $449/499€ (affiliate links)
Most of the sample images in this review can be found in full resolution here.
- Sony FE lenses: Our comprehensive and independent guide
- Tripods for mirrorless cameras
- Review: Sony FE 85mm 1.4 GM
- Review: Sony FE 24mm 1.4 GM
Latest posts by BastianK (see all)
- Analogue Adventures – Part 16: Kodak Gold 200 ECN-2 processed - March 23, 2023
- Finding photo opportunities near home – Part 2 - March 19, 2023
- Review: Contax-G 16mm 8.0 Hologon - March 12, 2023
52 thoughts on “Review: 7Artisans 75mm 1.25”
Tolles Review, wie immer 🙂 Darf ich fragen, bei welchem der diversen Händler du das Objektiv erworben hast? Ich würde den Versand aus der Volksrepublik irgendwie gerne vermeiden wollen, gibt’s da ne Möglichkeit? Vielen Dank im Voraus. Weiter so und viele Grüße aus‘m Ländle 🙂
For everyone from the EU it is probably best to check out the 7Artisans UK shop to avoid any hassle with customs and taxes.
Well the lens has some flaws, but looking at those images I cant see any of those flaws 😀 They all look pretty damn good.
For AF alternatives, also consider the Samyang 85mm f/1.4 AF FE which has received favourable reviews by opticallimits, lenstip and Dustin Abbott.
It surely is, I just didn’t list it because none of us has personal experience with it.
You forgot about Samyang 85mm f1.2 which is best 1.2 lens to date.
Corrected in almost every way, razor sharp wide open. I wpuld love to see your review of this lens..
The Samyang isn’t best according to Lenstip. The (Zhong Yi) Mitakon Speedmaster 85mm f/1.2 appears to have quite a bit better resolution in the center at all apertures from f/1.2 to f/4 and better max center resolution too. Only outside the central area is the Samyang better. Check here:
It also has better bokeh according to the same site.
I used both. Mitakon is far worse compared to Samyang XP 85mm.
Mable sample variation?
Thank you for the review. Today this lens will arrive at my place and I’m eager to test it.
For “perfect” images with a fast portrait lens I could use the Sigma XP 85mm or other f/1.4 ones, but I hope this lens will help to make pictures with a special “touch”
Thanks for your thorough review.
I could live with the flare, spherical aberration, coma, CA and _certainly_ focus shift (since I shoot mirrorless, not rangefinder), but I am very hesitant not to buy this lens for one particular reason, which appears to be a design choice: That the lens is less sharp at shorter distances than near infinity. My preference would clearly be to optimize sharpness between 1 and 3 meter, not at long distances.
Would be my preference, too.
Sorry … there’s a typo in the above post. It should say
“I am very hesitant to buy this lens”.
I have noticed that among photographers in eastern Asia full body portraiture is extremely usual and popular, probably more so than in the west. Maybe this taste explains in part this design choice.
Look for a very weak achromat lens to improve close(r) focus performance. Like 0,5 diopters (for 2m maximum focus distance) or less.
this is very interesting, would you mind elaborating a bit on this please?
I have the 7artisans 28/1.4 FE+ and 75/1.25 and I’m loving them so far.
You can use this calculator as a pretty good reference.
Using a close-up lens you lose the infinity setting. Where the new “infinity” ends up depends on the close-up lens’ diopter strength.
With a 0,5 diopter lens added, infinity focus on the lens should be around 2m actual subject distance. Minimum magnification according to the calculator is ~1:25 (far from infinity).
So in order to improve performance between 2 and 3m, you need a diopter that is smaller than 0,5.
For my CV50/1,2 I use a 0,66 diopter achromat, giving me ~1,5m as maximum subject distance, while raising maximum magnification to 1:5,5 or so.
thanks for this Chris, sorry for the very late thanks. any tips on where to get those achromats?
I feel that it’s good as it is. For close up portraits I would never use the f1,2 – 1,8 range anyway & for medium distance most other lenses falter, the Noctilux doesn’t, but I don’t have that kind of money..
Marumi DHG 330 Achromat macro +3 should improve close focusing at f1,25 / f2 (as it does on the voigtlander 40/1,2) by focusing the lens at the optimum range (>2-3 meters)
Maximum focusing distance for the Marumi is roughly 0,33m (1/3,3), so while it would make it a near-macro lens, it won’t help at normal distances. You’d need a ~0,3 diopter achromat. They are rare, but they exist.
Nice review, thank you! You mentioned in the sharpness section at the portrait distance you would choose f2.0. I don’t see any sample portraits at f2.0; they all seem to be wide open. Do you have any samples at 2.0 or 2.8?
“Portrait distance” is of course a loosely defined term.
I only rarely used this lens for head shots which is where I had a bit of a struggle to properly focus at times
because of the high amount of spherical aberration (the second in the bokeh section would qualify).
Nevertheless in that very section you mentioned you can see how the resolution improves from f/1.25 to f/2.0 to f/2.8.
If you are using a camera with less megapixels focusing could be a bit easier and depending on your output sizes you might come to a different conclusion altogether and might be fine with f/1.25 all the time.
I see the sharpness improves but I’d like to see the overall aesthetic of a portrait like say the policeman in the hat at night or the closeup of the girl in a coffee shop(?). Basically how clinical the whole frame looks and the separation with the higher sharpness and contrast.
Has some pluses but I’ll stick with my trusty Sony f/1.8 based on what I see here.
thank you very much for the great review Bastian, I have this lens on an a7r3 and I’m liking it so far.
sorry if this is a silly question, i am just getting into these niche subjects now, but would the Kolari sensor stack mod help here in any way? (https://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-kolari-ultra-thin-sensor-stack-modification/)
also, how about those plano convex filters, are those only improving wide angle lenses performances? (https://phillipreeve.net/blog/rangefinder-wide-angle-lenses-on-a7-cameras-problems-and-solutions/#Zeiss_ZM_35mm_14_Distagon-2)
thank you in advance.
No, there won’t be much effect on this 75mm lens.
Hi Bastian! I was wondering if you had any thoughts about how this compares to the Mitakon 50mm v3? Focal lengths aside, they seem to have similar goals of being shot wide open for portraiture. It looks like this lens is sharper, but wasn’t sure if you had a preference as far as bokeh went. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated!
I also think they are quite comparable.
I like the 7Artisans more as off center performance is better and the aperture diaphragm is a much smarter design.
Bokeh of the 75mm is not as dreamy wide open, but there is something to be said for both, so not a clear better/worse here.
Great review and very nice pictures.
Any chance to see the review of 7artisans 35mmF2.0 m mount? I wonder is it good?
or to compare with Voigtlander 35mmf1.4 e mount.
Image character reminds me Canon 85/1.2Lii, strange that this lens not mentioned as a alternative. I am enjoying Canon 85/1.2Lii on my Sony a7rii via Metabones 4. Otherwise, great review, as always, Bastian!
Why would you say “There are no 75mm AF lenses available”? There is an excellent 75mm APO-Summicron-SL with probably as shallow if not narrower depth of field as this f1.25 one.
Because that lens is of zero interest to our readers as it cannot be adapted to Sony cameras.
Do you have any thoughts on whether either the 28mm or the 75mm 7Artisans would work well on a Sony crop sensor like the a6500? My camera of choice is the A7ii but I like the a6500 for travel.
You can use both on your crop camera, I don’t see a reason not to.
Got a copy of this lens today and mine has no “play” in the aperture ring, meaning I can’t turn it beyond the click stops at 1,25 or 16 – not that interesting of a detail, but maybe the oddity in your lens was just something they fixed by now.
Comparing this one to the new Samyang AF 75mm 1.8 would make for an interesting read I guess, they’re the same price, but one is a fast but heavy chunk of glass and metal and the other is light and slow(er) but has AF…
That is interesting indeed. Possible they made some changes in the production.
Try the Ibiert 75mm F2.4 the sharpness will blow you away and it is tiny.
B&H sell it. I think it is the best in this category.
I have tried it once. I seriously doubt anything that you have just written.
with your great review in mind ich tried to get this lens on the used market. But only few were sold and then not for much less than new… But now, without warning, I got a chance to buy the 1,5/73mm Sonnetar from MS-Optical in good condition. I am very curious how it will perform compared to the 7artisans. I read good things concerning this lens. I will see….
Best wishes, Christian
Because of the Voigtländer 75mm 1.5 which isn’t much heavier or bigger I find the Sonnetar 73mm 1.5 a rather hard sell.
Wow this lens is seriously pretty poor wide open. It seems the Jupiter 9 is better than this and that thing isn’t winning any awards for its wide open performance other than its dreamy look
No it isn’t.
It is also a pretty moot comparison as one is an f/2 and the other one is an f/1.25 lens.
True true, I was looking too much at the close focusing rendering, it actually looks really nice at a distance. My biggest concern is finding a lens that is not too big but can achieve really smooth background separation so it seemed 90mm f2 could be comparable to 75 1.25 in that respect ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Small and smooth bokeh are rarely seen together.
I do like the 1.25/75’s bokeh, but I don’t like its weight.
So for me the VM 75mm 1.5 works best in that regard.
Yeah I’ll give that a look, thanks for the suggestion. I think I might also consider the nikkor ais 135 2.8 because apparently that is a first rate lens and it’s cheap and tiny as well!
Woah hold on there, apparently (via Sonyalpharumors) Cosina just patented a 135mm f2 and 135mm 1.2 (imagine trying to manual focus that big guy). Might have to see how much the kidney market is offering for kidneys 😉
as film rangefinder user I’m a little bit scared by focus shift (not valuable until you develop), would you be so kind to give me an idea how much it is at the distances you have tested this lens?
I mean: at the focus target distance you shot (by the way at which distance you placed the target?), how much you had to refocus? A few millimeters or more?
Same question about the banknote (distance 2,25 meters), how much you refocused in that situation?
Focus shift is not big, but I wouldn’t want to use any lens with these parameters on a camera equipped only with the rangefinder mechanism to focus.
As you have to use focus and recompose that alone will be responsible for loads of out of focus pictures, even if the rangefinder was accurate enough for a 75mm f/1.25 lens, which it isn’t.
Why don’t you let your readers know how the 7 Artisons 75mm 1.25 compares to the Leica.
What I would like to know is if it is close to the Leica sharpness or if it is far being as good as the Leica.
For that price that is what your readers would like to know
You are invited to send me a Leica 75mm 1.25 for a review.