Rolling Review: Sony FE 1.8/85


I have just reveiced my own copy of the Sony FE 1.8/85. I am happy to see that Sony continues to expand their budget prime lens lineup. Especially the Sony FE 2/28 reflects a great value for the price, we liked the Sony 2.8/50 Macro too.

Let’s take a closer look at the latest “budget” lens in this rolling review. The review will be updated periodly.

Sample Images

Sony A6500 | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution

Why did I decide to buy the Sony FE 1.8/85?

The people who follow me on Flickr or in the forums know that I have been using the Sony 1.4/85 GM for a while. There are a few (very obvious) reasons, why I am still considering to switch that lens for the FE 1.8/85.

  • Gain AF speed – I am using the A6500 for a while now and the Sony 1.4/85 can’t keep up with the blazing speed of the camera at times. Since I shoot a lot indoor action with my kid (swimming, romping, … ), that is one of my main criterias. I remember the 2/28 as a very fast lens and have high hopes here.
  • Save weight and buld – not much to say here. The difference is huge. I liked the Handling of the Sony 1.4/85 GM on the A7 but on the A6500 it just doesn’t feel right.
  • Save  (redistribute) some money – Yes, I am in the same boat as you and have to split my budget wisely. 85mm is a focal length that I like but I don’t use it as much as the other common focal lengths.


The Sony FE 1.8/85 has the following specifications:

    • Diameter: 78 mm
    • Field of view: 29° (diagonally)
    • Length:  82 mm
    • Weight: 371 g
    • Filter Diameter: 67 mm
    • Number of Aperture Blades: 9 (rounded)
    • Elements/Groups: 9/8
    • Close Focusing Distance: 0.8 m
    • Maximum Magnification: 1:7,7
    • Mount: Sony FE

You may also have a look at Sony’s official page.

If you appreciate this effort, please consider to buy your lens using one of these affiliate links:

How I get just announced lenses first: When I am really interested in a lens, I usually don’t preorder it but wait for the Item to show up on Ebay. Many local dealers who don’t have the maximum amount of preorders by their local customers sell the lenses right after they receive it. Therefore, I would recommend to check out or (afiliate links).

Of course, you can also preorder one for $599 at (affiliate link) or 649€ at (affiliate link).

Build Quality

The build quality of the Sony FE 1.8/85 is surprisingly nice. The outer barrel and the focusing ring are made out of metal. The button, the filter thread and the lens hood are made out of plastic. Nevertheless, the construction feels very solid, I have no complaints (especially for that price).

If you take a look at the size comparison below, you see that the FE 1.8/85 is much smaller and thinner than the Sony FE 1.4/85 GM. The 1.8/55 (results in 85mm on APS-C) is quite a bit smaller though.


The lens features an AF/MF-Switch and a focus hold button on the barrel. These are two features that I like a lot, especially the focus hold button can be customized to an “Eye AF-Button”.

The focus ring has good resistance and is well dampened. The focus ring has got linear coupling. Therefore, the focus throw from close focusing distance to inifinity is always 180°, no matter what speed you turn the ring. This feels much better (more manual) than the variable transmission of the earlier FE lenses.

The lens balances very good on the Sony A7II. It has just the right size for that camera.

Sony FE 1.8/85 mounted on the Sony A7II

On the A6500, the Sony FE 1.8/85 is quite large although it handles much better than it looks like.

Sony FE 1.8/85 mounted on the Sony A6500


Autofocus seems to be very fast on my A6500 (the A7II is too slow to judge that properly). The motor is silent. I have hoped that the lens will behave like the Sony FE 2/28 and not like the Sony FE 1.8/50. Luckily, my hopes came true. I would say that the AF of the Sony FE 1.8/85 is faster than the AF of the Sony 1.4/85 GM although I didn’t examine this in detail so far.

I have read several reports that the lens only focuses at working aperture in combination with the A6500. This in not completely true, although the camera does not open the aperture completely to focus. The behavior was inconsistent so far – sometimes it opens further, sometimes it is almost at working aperture. More testing needed.


Sharpness is simply outstanding for a lens in that price category. It is perfectly usable wide open and very sharp at f/2.8 across the frame. It outperforms the sensor at f/4 and starts to diffract afterwards.

f1.8: The center is very sharp, the midframe and the corners are quite sharp as well,g although visibly behind the center.

f2: Same as f1.8, a tad more contrasty

f2.8:  Midframe and corner get a visible boost in sharpness, very sharp across the frame

f4: Excellent across the frame, all aberrations gone

f5.6-f11: Sharpness decreases due to diffraction


I can’t discover any of it in Lightroom and in RAW Therapee. Not much to say here. The FE 1.8/85 seems to be free of distortion.


Sony bakes some automatic correction into the RAWs of the Sony FE 1.8/85. This can not be disabled by the user in Lightroom. If you look at the files in Lightroom, the lens shows a low amount of vignetting of 1.3 EV wide open.

However, a look on that file in RawTherapee showed that the Lightroom result is not the whole truth. The real vignetting of this lens is 2.1 EV which is a typical result for a lens in that class.

Side note: Other native lenses have also vignetting correction baked into the RAW image. Most reviews don’t mention that and the end user usually only sees the corrected image.

Flare & Ghostings

Flare performance is the achilles heel of the Sony FE 1.8/85. I have shot the lens in the toughest (brightest) conditions, therefore I could drive this aspect to the limits with this lens. As you can see in the extreme samples below, there is always veiling flare around the sun. Furthermore, there are several ghostings with hard and soft edges around the frame. In the worst case, contrast can be lowered across the whole image. This can be a limiting factor for landscape photography although I have to emphasize that these conditions are quite extreme.

Chromatic Aberrations


There are longitudinal chromatic aberrations wide open, take a look at the sample below:

Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
100% Crop of the image above

Purple Fringing

This lens shows some purple fringing at contrasty borders. It’s visible but not as bad as the Zeiss Makro Planar T* 2/100 for example. Check out the sample below:

Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
100% crop of the sample above


The bokeh is very smooth at close to portrait distances and gets more busy at further distances.

Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution

Sample Images

Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/4 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/8 | full resolution
Sony A7 II | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A6500 | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A6500 | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/1.8 | full resolution
Sony A6500 | Sony FE 1.8/85 | f/4 | full resolution

More full size samples in the FE 1.8/85 flickr gallery!


Sony 1.4/85 GM:
This lens has the smoothest bokeh of all native 85mm lenses. It is also sharp wide open and outstanding across the frame a little stopped down. It’s built like a tank but extremely heavy and large. I have used it for a few months now and can recommend it for portait work. I’ll try to shoot a comparison to the FE 1.8/85 in the future.

My Flickr gallery of the Sony 1.4/85 GM

Zeiss Batis 1.8/85:
I have owned the Batis shortly before the GM and liked it but not as much as the Sony 1.4/85 GM and the FE 1.8/85.

I prefer the Sony FE 1.8/85 over the Batis 1.8/85, because it is lighter, smaller, has a MF/AF switch, a focus hold button and is much cheaper. Optically, i have the impression that it is equally sharp. The Sony FE 1.8/85 distorts less and the bokeh seems to be smoother at close to portrait distances (I have not the possibility to make a direct comparison!). The Batis still offers better CA correction, better coatings (flare and ghostings) and subjectively better contrast and more intense colors straight out of the camera.

I had the impression that the OSS of the Batis 1.8/85 isn’t the most effective one and the OLED display felt pretty useless at that focal length.

Zeiss Loxia 2.4/85:
The Loxia 2.4/85 is a totally different lens than the FE 1.8/85. It’s features fully manual operation, is almost one stop slower, longer and much heavier. Nevertheless, it is much better corrected for chromatic aberrations, has better flare performance and is outstandingly sharp. It’s the best 85mm option for landscape photography and has the best manual focus operation. I prefer to have fast AF at this focal length for my portrait work.

First Impressions

This lens seems to deliver what I have hoped and expected. I see very good sharpness already wide open in the center and outstanding sharpness when stopped down to f2.8 across the whole frame as well as no distortion at all. Furthermore, the form factor feels just right, the build quality is nice and the AF operation in general feels satisfying.

Of course, a low priced but fast lens comes with some penalties. The lens shows some chromatic aberrations wide open. LoCA itself seems to be quite well corrected, I had the impression that this could be purple fringing (like it can be seen on the Zeiss Makro Planar T* 2/100 or the Sony 2.8/135 STF) but I have to take a closer look. Flare performance with the sun in the frame is bad and sharpness seems to decrease at the minimum focusing distance.

Nevertheless, the lens seems to be a great addition to the FE lineup, reflects an excellent price/performance ratio and is an serious option to work with.

Keep up with the rolling review to learn more about this lens. This review will be updated soon.

Please don’t forget to support our work and to keep this site running. You can easily do this when you buy your gear using one of these affiliate links. It won’t cost you anything!

You can buy the Sony FE 1.8/85 for $599/649€ at or (afiliate links).

Of course, you can also preorder one for $599 at (affiliate link) or 649€ at (affiliate link).

Rolling Review – History

16.03.2017 – Received the lens, first samples, Distortion and Flare added

17.03.2017 – Sharpness chart added, distortion double checked

18.03.2017 – LoCA and Purple Fringing sample added, new sample images

01.04.2017 – Big sample image update. Sorry for letting you wait for it, a disease and a business trip made it impossible to keep up!

02.04.2017 – Vignetting added

The following two tabs change content below.

Jannik Peters

Latest posts by Jannik Peters (see all)

51 thoughts on “Rolling Review: Sony FE 1.8/85”

    1. I am interested in that comparison as well but comparisons are always a pain to shoot and it will take some time.

  1. Hi Jannik,
    I have also been sniffing around to get to know more about this new lens. As you mentioned, it is too early for any conclusive judgement, but this one does seem to have given a brilliant performance so far. In my criteria, I would not even short-list a lens if it was heavier than 600g or larger than FE 16-35mm F4, no matter how excellent it may be. This highly portable, versatile MF-lens-friendly system design is the primary reason why Sony a7 series matters a lot to me. So hopefully it will be a good addition to the product range, and also hopefully to my gear. Thank you for your early report, and I am looking forward to the coming updates.

    1. Thank you for reviewing this lens!
      When you compare the bokeh of this lens with the GM would you mind to include the Samyang 85 f1.4 as well?
      Admiringlight compared the GM with the Samyang and the bokeh was on par.
      So it would be an interesting comparison with the sony 85 f1.8!

      1. Sorry, I don’t own that lens. I used to own it and found it never satisfyingly sharp wide open although the bokeh is quite smooth.

        All I can say is that the FE 1.8/85 is much sharper wide open but will probably have a bit harsher bokeh. I wouldn’t think twice and choose the FE 1.8/85, but I personally preferred even the Canon FD 1.8/85 over the Samyang.

  2. Jannik,

    Thank you very much for this review – looking forward to your updates 🙂

    You said that you’ve not been pleased with the bokeh of the Batis (“bokeh felt too nervous with critical backgrounds”) – do you believe the FE 1.8/85 to be better here?


    1. Hi Thomas,
      that’s a very tricky question. The FE 1.8/85 feels different than the Batis, but a feeling is not really helpful for a review. I think, it could handle certain situations different which includes the option to render better. I hope, someone in the web will do that comparison. I won’t buy the Batis again for that. Both are definitely weaker in that regard than the 1.4/85 GM.

  3. Thanks, again, for this nice review Jannik. Indeed a tempting lens. Own the Sony FE 70-200f4, nice lens but the bokeh isn’t that.
    Like also my excellent ContaxG 90mm f2.8, manual focus but great lens. Tried to photograph my grandchildren with this lens but they are rather difficult to stay in one place, a very normal situation 🙂
    The Sony FE 55mm f1.8….works but a little short.
    So all of these lenses lack what the 85mmf1.8 offers for a nice price. Seems the ideal portret lens to me and think it would be nice for some occasional macro as well (with an extension tube).
    And the f1.4 but seems a little big in size, weight and €€€ to me.
    Think I seriously consider this lens, compact, good quality, compact and reasonable price.

  4. Where does the Sigma 85mm 1.4 fit in with respect to these two lens. I am leaning on the 85mm GM given its time tested and perhaps a good option for portraiture. I read some exceptional reviews for the Sigma and was keen to get more reviews in comparison to the Sony 85mm 1.8 Vs Sigma 85mm 1.4 Vs Sony 85mm 1.4 GM

  5. Good initial review, Jannick.

    A few portrait style pix would be a nice addition if you can add some – or include some studio samples. The one landscape shot was pretty – I am using short teles more in that area and enjoy the slightly compressed look and isolation characteristics.

    The bokeh looks ‘nervous’ in the statue shot but very pretty in the floral closeup. Each lens has its own signature, eh?

    This will be a popular choice at a great price for a Japanese made lens that works well with Sony AF technology. Look forward to more coverage on it here.

  6. I’ve done throughout my roughly 51 of photography many portraiture work, with 35mm and medium cameras!

    But I must say, I have not missed any autofocus techniques for my portraiture work at all!

    1. I can unterstand that but there are situations in my life where MF is just too slow. I am talking mostly about child portraiture when the kids are in action.

      1. I am with you Jannik – while I rely primarily on my MF lenses for my landscape, an AF lens is on my camera 95% of the time in our house chasing our 2 year old and infant. They may not make the website portfolio, but it doesn’t mean they aren’t important pictures!
        Not to mention that this lens’s size/weight isn’t much different at all than a legacy fast 85mm MF lens. It appears to be a nice balance, and I’m planning to try it out myself! Thanks for giving the early review!

  7. Jannik – would it be hard to add comparison of the corrected purple fringing on the sign crop? I would like to see how this amount of fringing corrects in lightroom.

  8. Hi Jannik. So do you think the Batis still has practical advantages over the FE 85 1.8? I am thinking maybe flare resistance, LoCA and OSS for a body without IBIS?

    1. Agree. I think what we need so far is a clear line between Batis 85mm and Sony 85mm, so that every buyer would clearly understand why he/she should (or not) pay twice more for Batis.

      Batis 85mm is not an easy decision. ($1200, uuuhh)
      At the same time nobody wants to buy new Sony 85mm and be selling it off after a month of use.

      I would appreciate some clarity upon this matter. Thanks.

        1. Sounds right!
          I think, though, that the contrast difference is not something that can be fully replicated in post (I suppose that reduced contrast out of the lens means that the tones are squashed into fewer bits, so expansion doesn’t give you the same data as native high contrast). But that is small beer, especially given the weight difference. I’d probably buy the Sony now from scratch , but the ca and contrast effects are enough to stop me selling. And the fact that I never use lens buttons because it makes for more ergonomic differences between lenses…

          1. Good points. I’d really like to see a face to face comparison with the Batis regarding colors and contrast.

          2. I ordered Sony today. I hope I will be happy with it. )))

            At least I have extra $ 600 that I can use for Flashpoint AD600 or may be any other lens. )))

          1. The Sony is weathersealed to a certain degree as well. The difference is that the Batis has a rubber gasket around the lens mount. I’d have more trust in the Batis weathersealing.

  9. I received the 85mm a week ago, and I have to say so far so good. Very sharp on the A7II wide open, and good corner. Quick AF, nothing like the 50mm 1.8.

    1. What do you shoot mostly? Do you have a feeling you had better pay extra 600 and get Batis 85mm instead?

      1. Well, I mostly do portrait, and it is shart wide open, but with some AC. Stopping down to f2.8 gives verybgood results. Can’t say anything about the Batis as I don’t own it….

  10. Very interesting lens, and review of course ! (as usual ;-))
    I’d be curious to know how fast is the autofocus on an A7 first gen ? Compared to the 55mm, for example ? (that I own)
    Thanks !

  11. I’ve just tested the lens also and compared it to my GM 85 1.4. Well, the 85 1.8 seems to be similar to my Batis 85 but both can’t catch up with the GM lens. Give the photos you’ve made a closer look and you’ll see purple fringing with the 1.8, you’ll see less sharpness compared with the 1.4. The 1.8 is a really great lens but if you need the best image quality you have no choice but to take the really heavy GM lens.

    1. Thanks for your contribution, Micha! I am looking forward to do that comparison as well. I really like my 85 GM if the focus is on spot. It works amazing for more static work like classic portraits. Nevertheless, I have to put size, weight and price into that equation. I have no clue now if I prefer the 1.8/85 or the 1.4/85.

  12. Nice review. I used this lens for a full wedding (video) and loved it. Now I know why manual focusing felt so easy, with the linear coupling.

    I also bought the Batis before and returned it, hated that lens! Useless LED, horrible focus ring. The Batis OSS behaved weirdly during video use, so I contacted Zeiss support who told me I shouldn’t use OSS for video. Oh really. Thanks for nothing, Zeiss.

  13. Hi… thanks for this review. Would you be able to add some comparison with Loxia as well ? That would be really useful. – slightly different lens with manual focus etc., I know. I am looking for the one in portrait range 🙂 I didn’t like the ergonomics and rendering of Batis. OOF highlights looked un-appealing to me.

    1. Hi Mahesh,

      I don’t own the Loxia, only Bastian does. These lenses are probably too different to make a useful comparison, I plan to compare it with the GM as soon as I find some time.

      All I can say so far is that the Bokeh of the Loxia is more appealing than the one of the Batis. AF can be useful at that focal length, don’t forget that 😉


  14. I just received this lens this week.
    You mentioned that you can customize the button to use it as Eye-AF.
    Can’t find any information how to do it. Even in the manual doesn’t say anything.
    Do you know, how to use it with Eye-AF?

    1. Which camera do you use? It’s in the custom key configuration menu but not available for the A7/A7R (1st generation).

  15. Finally got my lens. Really nice! However, CA aberrations are everywhere if used at 1.8. (
    Now need to learn how to avoid them.

    1. They are worst when you shoot against the light with hard contrast edges. The best way to avoid them is to stop down in critical situations. I’ll take a closer look later on to the amount of CA at different stops, I just don’t have much time at the moment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *