Lens Reviews in one Sentence – Part 1: Voigtländer

Introduction

Voigtländer VM 50mm 1.0 Nokton on Leica M6

Modern Voigtländer branded lenses are made by Cosina in Japan. These are all manual focus lenses but except for the M-mount lenses they all feature electronic contacts to communicate with your camera. This is an overview of ~50 of their lenses with my opinion summarized in one sentence to give you an overview and starting point before delving into our in-depth reviews.

The one sentence reviews are a new concept I am testing here, please tell me in the comment section what you think of it.

E-mount

M-mount

F-mount

  • Voigtländer 28mm 2.8 SL IIs Color-Skopar
    Best manual focus 28mm option for F-mount with great minimum focus distance
  • Voigtländer 55mm 1.2 SL IIs Nokton
    Best f/1.2 lens for F-mount
  • Voigtländer 58mm 1.4 SL IIs Nokton
    Well balanced fast 58mm lens with nice rendering for portraits
  • Voigtländer 90mm 2.8 SL IIs Apo-Skopar
    Same optics as the M-mount version, sharp and nice bokeh but a lot of competition from faster and cheaper 85mm 1.8 F-mount lenses
  • Voigtländer 180mm 4.0 SL APO Lanthar
    One of the few lightweight tele primes, better at shorter distances than infinity, rare and therefore too expensive

Support Us

Did you find this article useful or just liked reading it? Treat us to a coffee!
via Paypal

This site contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase using any of the links marked as affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. This helps support the creation of future content.

The following two tabs change content below.
My name is Bastian and I am your expert here when it comes to ultra wide angle lenses, super fast portrait lenses (ranging from a 50mm f/0.95 to a 200mm f/1.8) and I also have reviewed way too many 35mm lenses. Don't ask me anything about macro or wildlife shooting though.

30 thoughts on “Lens Reviews in one Sentence – Part 1: Voigtländer”

  1. Nicely done, but a little too concise. Maybe it would be useful to throw in some numbers for a handful of categories (sharpness, coma etc.) like they do in Pentaxforum. Or just that final “conclusion” (plus, minus, meh) you already show in the extended reviews (you can somehow code them in order to make them shorter and keep them on one or two line of text).

  2. some valuable information/opinion here, would love seeing this added (to all lenses) in the FE-List spreadsheet.

  3. Interesting idea. This can be a fine starting point when contemplating a lens choice, and full reviews are there for further reading. It’s like a better version of a plain lens list.

  4. I like this concept! There’re way too many Sony-compatible lenses already, an it’s a good starting point.

  5. interesting article format
    remark on the Voigtländer 21mm 3.5 Color-Skopar E

    “Nice and compact 21mm lens, but for a little more money you can get one of the ultra wide angle zooms which might make more sense”
    > i dont see how an AF zoom can make more sense vs a prime, orange vs apple … this prime value prop is all about compactness and voigtlander UX and rendering. its not meant to compete vs a versatile and large zoom. better compare it to sigma 21 3.5 or loxia 21 2.8?

    thanks for the great article.
    Thibault

    1. I agree, zooms aren’t going to have the same sunstars and perhaps not contrast and color, or indeed the same feel when operating. I don’t think the sentence is wrong per say, I do however think about three sentence reviews would be much more valuable : )

  6. I like the format. A good way to narrow the choices before digging into the full-lenght review. Appreciate all you’re doing for the site.

  7. Bastain, I like it. The main purpose for me would be a starting point to dig deeper. It’s a nice overview of the complete offering – thank you!

  8. I picked up the 40mm f/2 and 75mm 1.5 used on my Nikon ZF and love the combination. Your thoughts?

  9. I like the one-sentence concept. I find myself in the market for an M-mount medium tele and I had read Bastian’s previous individual reviews of the various Voigtlander options, so this summary provided a convenient reminder of which ones should be on my shortlist. Thanks!

  10. Love this format!

    Voigtländer 35mm 1.7 VM Ultron
    No idea why this has been discontinued, the sharpest 35mm M-mount lens faster than f/2.0

    On this, you’d rate it sharper than the ZEISS 35/1.4?

  11. Interesting idea, but I agree with the first comment made, and would suggest a graphic (icon) and/or color coding, with for example a 1-10 scale for some variables like focus shift, field curvature, Laca, Loca, sharpness/contrast, Vignetting, Distortion, Build/Handling, etc.
    I noticed that two lenses in the list of one-sentence reviews are not available in full review format, like the Voigtländer 28mm 2.8 SL IIs Color-Skopar (Best manual focus 28mm option for F-mount with great minimum focus distance.), or the Voigtländer 90mm 2.8 SL IIs Apo-Skopar (Same optics as the M-mount version, sharp and nice bokeh but a lot of competition from faster and cheaper 85mm 1.8 F-mount lenses.) Are those reviews in the pipeline?

  12. Great way to index all the hard work you and crew have put into reviewing lenses. Looking forward to seeing which brand you do next.

  13. On the risk of asking you to speculate, are so many Sony versions discontinued because newer versions are coming, or is Cosina focusing on other mounts?

    1. I guess the SE versions as well as the 12mm didn’t sell particularly well.
      I also guess there is currently more money to be made in Z and RF mount where apparently not many third party manufacturers are allowed to sell lenses with electronics.

  14. Good read. Thanks for posting. I have been a long time Nikon, Zeiss and Leica user since my teen years. Back in the day when shooting film pixel peeing was yet to evolve. For the most part, most lenses performed well except forthos Spiratone long lenses that sold for 70.00 🙂 None the less, As of recently I have been enamored woith the new line of Voigtlander lenses for the M and Z. In particular the Apo lanthars and the 50 1.0. So much so that I have created a website http://www.voigtlanderimages.com just to host photos captured with voigtlander lenses. As of today, I own several of the newer lenses and have sold my Leica glass as I found it to be marginally better than the voigtlander if not equal. So, why hang on to them? In all honesty, photography should be about results and less of a fashion statement. I believe the Voigtlander delivers whta is needed for today’s modern cameras.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *